PFD report

Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Mar 2018•London (East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to address cross-practice recurrence of mental health care coordination concerns
  2. Delays in delivery of mental health clinic letters to GPs
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs
  3. Inability of GPs to implement rapid and accurate specialist-directed medication changes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable implementation of medication changes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Continue joint NELFT–Fullwell Cross meetings to agree the process for referrals, prescribing during medication changes and communication, including reconvening to resolve prescribing responsibilities.

    Stated by North East London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 June 2018.
  2. Action

    Work with NELFT and the CCG to roll out the improved practices across Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge.

    Stated by North East London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 June 2018.
  3. Action

    Send NELFT correspondence electronically using the patient’s NHS number and initials as the email subject, and communicate this practice to Redbridge GPs and mental health services.

    Stated by North East London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 June 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    NELFT cannot facilitate compliance aids through local pharmacists, so medication for patients using them must be organised by GPs.

    Stated by North East London NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to address cross-practice recurrence of mental health care coordination concerns

Wider context from the report

“(6) It is accepted that the concerns in this case are unlikely to be restricted to the Fulwell Cross Surgery. If a joint protocol is agreed between the Trust and the Practice, this could be shared more widely with other practices. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in delivery of mental health clinic letters to GPs

Wider context from the report

“(2) There were often delays (in excess of 14 days) in the delivery to the GP of clinic letters from the mental health trust. Often, the clinic letters contained requests for the GP to make changes to medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability of GPs to implement rapid and accurate specialist-directed medication changes

Wider context from the report

“(4) In times of acute mental health crisis, medication if often rapidly changed/supplemented. Mrs Campbell-Scott had 7 changes in her medication regime between 21 November 2016 to 23 February 2017. It is challenging for GPs to be able to ensure rapid and accurate changes when medication changes are directed by the specialist team. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable implementation of medication changes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of mental health referral routing between teams

Wider context from the report

“(1) The GP had sent the referral to the wrong team of the mental health trust. The referral then got lost between the receiving team and the correct team (the older age mental health team). This resulted in a 4 month delay in Maureen Campbell-Scott receiving an assessment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to integrate mental health services across care settings; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of joint coordination between mental health and primary care services

Wider context from the report

“(5) At the time of the Inquest hearing, there had been no joint meeting between the mental health trust and the GP practice to consider the best way forward in terms of referrals to the service; prescribing during times of dynamic medication changes and general communication between the GP and the psychiatrist. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to integrate mental health services across care settings; Insufficient multi-disciplinary coordination in mental health care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of GP prescribing to follow psychiatric team direction

Wider context from the report

“(3) The prescribing by the GP did not always follow the direction given by the psychiatric team. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable doctor-to-doctor coordination of prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue joint NELFT–Fullwell Cross meetings to agree the process for referrals, prescribing during medication changes and communication, including reconvening to resolve prescribing responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have had two meetings with the Fullwell Cross Practice and believe that we had agreed a process regarding the prescribing of medication to our shared patients. It was only on Tuesday of this week that we were informed that the practice had some late reservations about this specific aspect of the joint action plan. As such we are reconvening a meeting with Primary Care Colleagues to discuss the position further and agree a way forward.”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with NELFT and the CCG to roll out the improved practices across Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is accepted that the concerns in this case are unlikely to be restricted to the Fullwell Cross Surgery. If a joint protocol is agreed between the Trust and the Practice, this could be shared more widely with other practices.”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 7 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send NELFT correspondence electronically using the patient’s NHS number and initials as the email subject, and communicate this practice to Redbridge GPs and mental health services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2a | NELFT Action | All correspondence to be sent via email. Subject of emails to be patient NHS number and patient initials. | NELFT Dr Shweta Anand & Maria Thorn, Assistant Director | 18/05/18 | Completed”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 4 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require doctors to include their telephone number on medication-change notifications sent to GPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2c | NELFT Action | All Doctors to add their telephone number to the bottom of ‘change of medication notification’ | NELFT Dr Shweta Anand | 18/05/18 | Completed”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 4 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Email medication changes to GPs within 24 working hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2b | NELFT Action | Medication changes to be emailed to GP within 24 working hours. | NELFT Dr Shweta Anand | 18/05/18 | Completed”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 4 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Process every NELFT referral and redirect misrouted referrals to the correct team within two working days.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1b | NELFT Action | All referrals into NELFT will be processed, if the referral is sent to the wrong team NELFT will ensure the referral goes to the correct team within 2 working days. | NELFT Bob Edwards, ICD for Redbridge | 18/05/18 | Completed”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 3 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Compile and redistribute NELFT consultant psychiatrists’ telephone numbers to Redbridge GPs so they can contact prescribing clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have already agreed to provide personal contact details of NELFT Consultant’s to GPs for additional support and this action is already in place to allow GP’s to access advice regarding the management of people who have mental health problems. NELFT attended a very successful event with all Redbridge GP’s last week, where our staff did a series of table presentation to the GP’s. The theme was around mental health services and the crisis care pathway. We believe this will aid our future joint working with GP’s within the borough. The event was coordinated by ████████ who is the BHR CCG Lead GP for Mental Health. At the event he briefed GP’s regarding future communication methods and that all communication will move to being electronic in line with the action plan in relation to this regulation 28.”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 2 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NELFT cannot facilitate compliance aids through local pharmacists, so medication for patients using them must be organised by GPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NELFT cannot undertake prescribing because it lacks arrangements with community pharmacists to ensure frail patients receive medication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NELFT cannot use FP10 prescribing for many Older Adult Mental Health Team patients who lack capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NELFT cannot undertake prescribing because prescribers lack an overview of patients’ full medication and may miss interactions or contraindications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NELFT cannot undertake FP10 prescribing for many patients in care or sheltered accommodation because those settings will not accept such prescriptions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 1 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide GPs with direct numbers for doctors’ medical secretaries, including a colleague’s number when a doctor is absent.

    Stated by North East London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 June 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide GPs with direct numbers for doctors’ medical secretaries, including a colleague’s number when a doctor is absent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4c NELFT Action NELFT will provide Doctors Medical Secretaries direct number to GP’s.”

Source location

2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
Page 6 · response
Published 16 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026