PFD report

baby Dominic Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Jun 2016•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
14

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised14

  1. Failure to act on early warning scores
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations
  2. Failure to carry out maternal observations after delivery despite a temperature spike
  3. Failure to recognise signs and symptoms of neonatal deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. Action

    Introduce a newborn observation chart based on the British Association of Paediatric Medicine Newborn Early Warning Score.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 June 2016.
  2. Action

    Pilot the revised Maternity Early Warning Scoring Chart and make necessary alterations before embedding it in practice.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 June 2016.
  3. Action

    Conduct rolling audits of communication and documentation to identify compliance gaps and remedial measures.

    Stated by The TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 June 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Routine antenatal GBS screening is not recommended because evidence of mortality benefit is lacking and screening may cause maternal, neonatal and antimicrobial harms.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to act on early warning scores

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration; Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out maternal observations after delivery despite a temperature spike

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise signs and symptoms of neonatal deterioration

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate clinical communication and handover

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified and part-time midwives

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate competence assurance and supervision for inexperienced midwives.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of midwives to escalate to or consult with relevant specialist clinicians

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out speculum examination to establish rupture of membranes

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document rationale for clinical discretion

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out neonatal observations after material change in condition

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely offer intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics to women with current or previous positive GBS tests

Wider context from the report

“Department of Health, NIHCE and the Royal Colleges: 1. I previously completed a PFD 13 month ago in relation to a neonatal GBS death. At that time I raised the following concerns: - That antenatal screening for GBS was not being routinely offered by the NHS to all pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy, - That prophylaxis intrapartum antibiotics were not routinely offered to all women who test positive for GBS (or have done so in the past) & - That given the seriousness of the illness, in the absence of a national screening and prophylactic treatment programme, babies were potentially being put at risk of harm/death. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death the evidence suggested that no further action has been taken in this regard, despite the responses received in relation to the last PFD action. I therefore raise the issues again as a concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide indicated antibiotic prophylaxis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of staff to follow clinical protocols and guidance

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely offer antenatal GBS screening to pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy

Wider context from the report

“Department of Health, NIHCE and the Royal Colleges: 1. I previously completed a PFD 13 month ago in relation to a neonatal GBS death. At that time I raised the following concerns: - That antenatal screening for GBS was not being routinely offered by the NHS to all pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy, - That prophylaxis intrapartum antibiotics were not routinely offered to all women who test positive for GBS (or have done so in the past) & - That given the seriousness of the illness, in the absence of a national screening and prophylactic treatment programme, babies were potentially being put at risk of harm/death. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death the evidence suggested that no further action has been taken in this regard, despite the responses received in relation to the last PFD action. I therefore raise the issues again as a concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably provide antenatal GBS screening.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Miscalculation of early warning scores

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration; Unreliable escalation of abnormal clinical observations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate clinical record keeping

Wider context from the report

“Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust: 1. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death, the following concerns arose: - Inadequate communication, handover and record keeping; - Staff did not follow the Trust’s protocols/guidance and did not document their rationale where they exercised clinical discretion; - Midwives did not carry out a speculum examination, on two separate occasions, in order to establish whether there had been a rupture of membranes. The time between rupture and delivery was, more likely than not, miscalculated as a result of this; - Early warning scores were i) miscalculated, ii) not acted upon; - Neonatal observations were not carried out when it became apparent that there had been a material change in baby’s condition. Signs and symptoms relating to the deterioration were also missed; - Maternal observations were not carried out after delivery, despite a spike in temperature; - Midwives did not escalate to or consult with the Obstetrician/Paediatrician/Neonatologist & - Inadequate preceptorship for newly qualified (and particularly part-time) Midwives. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a newborn observation chart based on the British Association of Paediatric Medicine Newborn Early Warning Score.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been an audit as part of the divisional yearly programme looking at compliance with the Early Onset Sepsis Guidelines. Actions put in place following the audit was to introduce a new observation chart based on the Newborn Early Warning Score recommended by British Association of Paediatric Medicine (BAPM) and this work is in progress. Once completed there will be further audits to monitor compliance.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot the revised Maternity Early Warning Scoring Chart and make necessary alterations before embedding it in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within the maternity services, a specific Maternity Early Warning Scoring Chart (MEWS) has been revised which has greater sensitivity to the needs of the physical parameters of women during pregnancy. This tool is in the pilot phase currently to enable any necessary alterations to be implemented prior to being fully embedded in practice.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct rolling audits of communication and documentation to identify compliance gaps and remedial measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Division of Women and Children’s is undertaking a programme of rolling audits on communication and documentation. The purpose is to ensure compliance with policy standards and to identify areas where there are challenges in order to implement remediating measures.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide mandatory Care of the Compromised Infant training to midwives to support early detection and appropriate response to deterioration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The neonatal services has developed a module of training entitled Care of the Compromised Infant, which now forms part of each midwife’s mandatory training; the”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Critical Care outreach support and follow-up when elevated early warning scores are identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Critical Care outreach team are also supporting the Division where elevated early warning scores are identified. This involves direct care by the outreach team and subsequent follow up to ensure stabilisation of the patient.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue guidance requiring thorough rupture-of-membranes histories and appropriate speculum examinations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been guidance issued to all practitioners to reiterate the need to obtain a thorough, probing history from the patients to ensure questioning covers the potential rupture of membranes in line with policy and carry out an appropriate speculum examination. The incident and investigation has been widely discussed with the birthing centre and community midwives, in particular.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate lessons learned from the incident to obstetric midwives and medical staff using a lessons-learned proforma.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The findings from the RCA and in particular the lack of adherence to protocols are part of a process which aims to embed learning from incidents within the division. In this particular case, a lessons learned proforma was sent to all midwives and medical staff within obstetrics to share more widely the key themes around care delivery within the Division.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit a practice development midwife to support preceptorship and provide a reference point for newly qualified midwives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A practice development midwife has been recruited to support the preceptorship programme and to act as a reference point for new midwives in practice.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the commissioned improvement programme to embed reliable communication, handover and documentation processes in clinical practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The division has commissioned an improvement programme of work focusing on these three areas in order to fully embed effective and reliable processes into clinical practice.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver training on recognising abnormal maternal observations and escalating to medical practitioners with clear clinical management plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Division have developed a programme of training to emphasise recognition of signs and symptoms or deviations from normal physiological observations.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the Trust-wide project and improvement measures to improve accurate acute monitoring using early warning scores.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Undertaking correct acute monitoring of patients condition, through using early warning score is currently a Trust wide project to improve practice.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the midwifery preceptorship programme with a competency-based framework, rotating preceptors and structured support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Preceptorship programme has been updated in order to provide a competency based framework to support newly qualified midwives to become confident practitioners. This has been adjusted most recently following feedback from recent cohorts, with a view to embedding lessons learned from incidents and complaints into clinical practice.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit compliance with the Early Onset Sepsis Guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been an audit as part of the divisional yearly programme looking at compliance with the Early Onset Sepsis Guidelines. Actions put in place following the audit was to introduce a new observation chart based on the Newborn Early Warning Score recommended by British Association of Paediatric Medicine (BAPM) and this work is in progress. Once completed there will be further audits to monitor compliance.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine antenatal GBS screening is not recommended because evidence of mortality benefit is lacking and screening may cause maternal, neonatal and antimicrobial harms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The UK National Screening Committee does not recommend routine screening of all pregnant women for GBS carriage. We note that the National Screening Committee is due to review this recommendation again in 2015/16.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-RCPCH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The NHS Trust, rather than the College, is responsible for responding on local communication, record keeping, policies and procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given that we do not have all the details of the tragic death of Baby Smith, the RCPCH is unable to comment on the specifics of the case and the Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust has been asked to respond directly on local communication, record keeping and policies and procedures.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-RCPCH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss the incident and investigation findings with birthing-centre and community midwives.

    Stated by The TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 June 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the incident and investigation findings with birthing-centre and community midwives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been guidance issued to all practitioners to reiterate the need to obtain a thorough, probing history from the patients to ensure questioning covers the potential rupture of membranes in line with policy and carry out an appropriate speculum examination. The incident and investigation has been widely discussed with the birthing centre and community midwives, in particular.”

Source location

2016-0240-Response-by-The-Pennine-Acute-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 June 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026