PFD report

Daniel Jeffrey Moran · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Jan 2020•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to consider admission circumstances and current risks in self-discharge decisions
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe self-discharge decision-making
  2. Failure to keep contemporaneous documentation of decision-making rationale and changes in risk and capacity
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisions
  3. Failure to clarify ward staff and ward doctors' roles and responsibilities for managing patient risk and authorising leave
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider admission circumstances and current risks in self-discharge decisions

Wider context from the report

“4. Doctors and ward staff involved in making decisions about self-discharge should consider the circumstances of admission as well as current risks when making decisions around discharge. They also need a greater understanding of the circumstances when it is appropriate to seek more senior opinions in regards to whether the patients meets the criteria to be detained under the Mental Health Act, section 5 (2) and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to their decision making rationale. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes; Unsafe self-discharge decision-making.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep contemporaneous documentation of decision-making rationale and changes in risk and capacity

Wider context from the report

“3. Ward staff and ward doctors need to have a greater understanding of each other’s roles and responsibilities in relation to managing patient risk and whose responsibility it is to authorise leave and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to the decision making rationale (documenting any changes in risk and capacity). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to clarify ward staff and ward doctors' roles and responsibilities for managing patient risk and authorising leave

Wider context from the report

“3. Ward staff and ward doctors need to have a greater understanding of each other’s roles and responsibilities in relation to managing patient risk and whose responsibility it is to authorise leave and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to the decision making rationale (documenting any changes in risk and capacity). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep contemporaneous documentation of self-discharge and detention decision-making rationale

Wider context from the report

“4. Doctors and ward staff involved in making decisions about self-discharge should consider the circumstances of admission as well as current risks when making decisions around discharge. They also need a greater understanding of the circumstances when it is appropriate to seek more senior opinions in regards to whether the patients meets the criteria to be detained under the Mental Health Act, section 5 (2) and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to their decision making rationale. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge documentation; Unreliable hospital discharge processes; Unreliable lawful decision-making for mental health patient detention and return; Unsafe self-discharge decision-making.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prioritise new admissions and maintain patient flow through the ward

Wider context from the report

“2. Ward staff needed to have a greater understanding of how to prioritise new admissions and ensure the better flow of patients through the ward ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flow.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise when to seek senior opinions about Mental Health Act section 5(2) detention criteria

Wider context from the report

“4. Doctors and ward staff involved in making decisions about self-discharge should consider the circumstances of admission as well as current risks when making decisions around discharge. They also need a greater understanding of the circumstances when it is appropriate to seek more senior opinions in regards to whether the patients meets the criteria to be detained under the Mental Health Act, section 5 (2) and ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to their decision making rationale. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure timely and appropriate Mental Health Act assessment; Unreliable lawful decision-making for mental health patient detention and return; Unsafe self-discharge decision-making.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise when patient confidentiality should be breached to notify family or friends about patient safety or welfare concerns

Wider context from the report

“1. Staff were unaware of the situations where it was appropriate to breach patient confidentiality and notify family or friends, when concerns arose regarding patient safety/welfare. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families; Unreliable confidentiality arrangements for sharing safety-critical welfare information.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.