PFD report

Phillip Roy Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2015•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to obtain appropriate senior medical review or support when deterioration is identified
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient carePart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably escalate requests for medical reviewPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
  2. Failure to make accurate and complete doctors’ records
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to make complete and accurate nursing records
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain appropriate senior medical review or support when deterioration is identified

Wider context from the report

“(3) Junior Doctor’s Involvement i) The senior nurse on duty was concerned of Mr. Smith’s deterioration in the early hours of the 15th March. At the time of the junior doctor’s attendance she suggested that a more senior medical review should take place, however the junior doctor indicated that he did not require any further support in the circumstances notwithstanding Mr. Smith’s presentation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care; Failure to reliably escalate requests for medical review; Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make accurate and complete doctors’ records

Wider context from the report

“(2) Standard of Doctors’ Records i) Junior Doctor’s involvement – neither the junior or middle grade doctors who reviewed Mr. Smith in the early hours of the 15th March 2014 made accurate records of their review and assessment of Mr. Smith. ii) Blood gasses assessment was undertaken by the junior doctor on his attendance around 1.30 a.m. but no record was made of this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make complete and accurate nursing records

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Standard of Nursing Records i) On the evening of the 14th March 2014 observation were repeated 30 minutes after the standard observations were undertaken, but no record was made of these repeat observations. ii) Mr. Smith declined his evening medications, but this was not recorded. iii) Mr. Smith was given Tramadol at around 1.00 a.m. on the morning of the 15th March but this was not recorded. iv) Mr. Smith was found laid on the floor beside his bed in the early hours of the 15th March but full details of this event was not made by the nursing staff on duty. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.