PFD report

Jayne Jowett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 May 2015•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of National Early Warning Score training to improve patient assessment
  2. Low PIC staff understanding of significant clinical signs and oxygen requirements
  3. Lack of clear guidance for communicating patients’ physical condition to GPs
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Maintain a Service Level Agreement with the local GP practice for joint care.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  2. Action

    Include NEWS training in induction for all new qualified staff.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  3. Action

    Retrain qualified staff at relevant sites in NEWS interpretation and escalation responses.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of National Early Warning Score training to improve patient assessment

Wider context from the report

“1. PIC Staff Training in National Early Warning Scores: Training in both interpretation of scores, and response to escalation in scores has not to date demonstrated improvement in assessment of a patients clinical condition. The impact of training on patient assessment requires ongoing audit and monitoring. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Low PIC staff understanding of significant clinical signs and oxygen requirements

Wider context from the report

“2. PIC staff at Annesley House have low levels of understanding of the significance of clinical signs such as cyanosis, pallor, breathlessness, and the significance of a patient needing oxygen treatment. There are no plans currently in place to address this ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear guidance for communicating patients’ physical condition to GPs

Wider context from the report

“3. There remains no clear current service level agreement regarding how best for PIC to work with the local GP surgery to provide high quality joint care. There is no clear guidance that ensures all information regarding a patient’s physical condition is communicated to a GP when seeing a patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of ongoing audit and monitoring of training impact on patient assessment

Wider context from the report

“1. PIC Staff Training in National Early Warning Scores: Training in both interpretation of scores, and response to escalation in scores has not to date demonstrated improvement in assessment of a patients clinical condition. The impact of training on patient assessment requires ongoing audit and monitoring. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear service level agreement for PIC and GP joint care

Wider context from the report

“3. There remains no clear current service level agreement regarding how best for PIC to work with the local GP surgery to provide high quality joint care. There is no clear guidance that ensures all information regarding a patient’s physical condition is communicated to a GP when seeing a patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of inter-provider healthcare service agreements; Unsafe coordination of shared care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a Service Level Agreement with the local GP practice for joint care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Annesley House works closely with the local GP practice at Ashfield House Surgery. I am pleased to say that we have a Service Level Agreement in place and a copy of this is attached.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include NEWS training in induction for all new qualified staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All nursing staff at relevant sites were trained on the NEWS when this was rolled out originally in 2013, and all qualified staff at those sites have been retrained on this following this inquiry. We have now also arranged for this to form part of the induction training so that all new qualified staff will be trained on this as part of their induction to PIC. Additionally, the training is to be refreshed annually. Staff receive an email reminder of the need to do this annual refresher training. Part of the PIC internal audit system includes checking that staff complete their necessary training.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Retrain qualified staff at relevant sites in NEWS interpretation and escalation responses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All nursing staff at relevant sites were trained on the NEWS when this was rolled out originally in 2013, and all qualified staff at those sites have been retrained on this following this inquiry. We have now also arranged for this to form part of the induction training so that all new qualified staff will be trained on this as part of their induction to PIC. Additionally, the training is to be refreshed annually. Staff receive an email reminder of the need to do this annual refresher training. Part of the PIC internal audit system includes checking that staff complete their necessary training.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh NEWS training annually and remind staff to complete the refresher.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All nursing staff at relevant sites were trained on the NEWS when this was rolled out originally in 2013, and all qualified staff at those sites have been retrained on this following this inquiry. We have now also arranged for this to form part of the induction training so that all new qualified staff will be trained on this as part of their induction to PIC. Additionally, the training is to be refreshed annually. Staff receive an email reminder of the need to do this annual refresher training. Part of the PIC internal audit system includes checking that staff complete their necessary training.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide NEWS policies and guidance on the PIC intranet for staff reference.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further, the policy and details relating to NEWS are available for staff to access on the PIC intranet so that they can refresh themselves at any time where necessary.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Intermediate Life Support training covering recognition of cyanosis, pallor, breathlessness and oxygen-treatment needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The training provided by PIC is extensive. This includes training in Intermediate Life Support (“ILS”) for all doctors, registered nurses, and tutors responsible for training staff in relation to the management of violence and aggression. The ILS training that we provide includes recognition of these issues. The training providers who deliver this training are all externally accredited to provide training on these matters, and the content of the courses is periodically reviewed by PIC as part of its governance processes. We will also be ensuring that staff are aware of the specific identification of clinical issues that you have raised here through the one to one supervisions in which staff have their clinical practice discussed by a Senior Manager.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Address identification of specified clinical issues through one-to-one clinical-practice supervisions with a Senior Manager.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The training provided by PIC is extensive. This includes training in Intermediate Life Support (“ILS”) for all doctors, registered nurses, and tutors responsible for training staff in relation to the management of violence and aggression. The ILS training that we provide includes recognition of these issues. The training providers who deliver this training are all externally accredited to provide training on these matters, and the content of the courses is periodically reviewed by PIC as part of its governance processes. We will also be ensuring that staff are aware of the specific identification of clinical issues that you have raised here through the one to one supervisions in which staff have their clinical practice discussed by a Senior Manager.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Monitor NEWS use through registered-manager duties, monthly clinical governance meetings and the morning management meeting.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  2. 2

    Use externally accredited providers to deliver Intermediate Life Support training.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  3. 3

    Periodically review training-course content through PIC governance processes.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  4. 4

    Review the medical emergencies policy with the Group Medical Director.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  5. 5

    Place a physical-health NEWS algorithm in each clinic room and ward office at Annesley House.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 May 2015.
  6. 6

    Audit completion of required staff training through the internal audit system.

    Stated by Ashfield House Surgery and Partnerships in Care LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 May 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor NEWS use through registered-manager duties, monthly clinical governance meetings and the morning management meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Overview monitoring of the use of NEWS is undertaken by our registered managers as part of their general duties and throughout clinical governance meetings, which are held monthly. Direct monitoring is undertaken by physical health care issues being a standing agenda item in the morning management meeting at Annesley hospital and anybody who has had any physical health concerns requiring the NEWS to be used will be discussed at that meeting.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use externally accredited providers to deliver Intermediate Life Support training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The training provided by PIC is extensive. This includes training in Intermediate Life Support (“ILS”) for all doctors, registered nurses, and tutors responsible for training staff in relation to the management of violence and aggression. The ILS training that we provide includes recognition of these issues. The training providers who deliver this training are all externally accredited to provide training on these matters, and the content of the courses is periodically reviewed by PIC as part of its governance processes. We will also be ensuring that staff are aware of the specific identification of clinical issues that you have raised here through the one to one supervisions in which staff have their clinical practice discussed by a Senior Manager.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Periodically review training-course content through PIC governance processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The training provided by PIC is extensive. This includes training in Intermediate Life Support (“ILS”) for all doctors, registered nurses, and tutors responsible for training staff in relation to the management of violence and aggression. The ILS training that we provide includes recognition of these issues. The training providers who deliver this training are all externally accredited to provide training on these matters, and the content of the courses is periodically reviewed by PIC as part of its governance processes. We will also be ensuring that staff are aware of the specific identification of clinical issues that you have raised here through the one to one supervisions in which staff have their clinical practice discussed by a Senior Manager.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the medical emergencies policy with the Group Medical Director.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PIC has reviewed its medical emergencies policy with the assistance of the Group Medical Director and we have placed a physical health NEWS algorithm in each clinic room and ward office at Annesley House.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Place a physical-health NEWS algorithm in each clinic room and ward office at Annesley House.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PIC has reviewed its medical emergencies policy with the assistance of the Group Medical Director and we have placed a physical health NEWS algorithm in each clinic room and ward office at Annesley House.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 2 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit completion of required staff training through the internal audit system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All nursing staff at relevant sites were trained on the NEWS when this was rolled out originally in 2013, and all qualified staff at those sites have been retrained on this following this inquiry. We have now also arranged for this to form part of the induction training so that all new qualified staff will be trained on this as part of their induction to PIC. Additionally, the training is to be refreshed annually. Staff receive an email reminder of the need to do this annual refresher training. Part of the PIC internal audit system includes checking that staff complete their necessary training.”

Source location

2015-0175-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
Page 1 · response
Published 1 May 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026