PFD report

Mary Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Sep 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Delays in completing falls risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Failure to manage risks from lost medical records
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable management of lost clinical records
  3. Limited availability and low prioritisation of transport for frail elderly patient transfers
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing falls risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“2. The falls risk assessment was completed outside the Trust target time primarily as a result of the late arrival; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to manage risks from lost medical records

Wider context from the report

“4. The documentation issue was exacerbated by the Trust IT merger having resulted in the loss of a number of key documents. It was unclear how the Trust were managing the risks around lost medical records where the IT merger was at the root of the issue; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable management of lost clinical records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited availability and low prioritisation of transport for frail elderly patient transfers

Wider context from the report

“1. Mary Jones was a frail elderly lady who was moved from the MRI to Trafford General post-operatively for rehabilitation under the Trust structure. It was a planned transfer. However due to limited transport availability she arrived at Trafford General out of hours after waiting for transfer. As a result she was clerked in and risk assessed out of hours despite the recognised risks of moving frail elderly patients out of hours. The inquest was told that this is not uncommon as transfers such as these are made via ambulance and are a low priority and moved where needed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to clinically review fluid chart outcomes

Wider context from the report

“6. There was no evidence of clear clinical review of the outcome of the fluid charts. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable management of patients’ fluid requirements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record or trace SALT referrals

Wider context from the report

“5. Despite her frailty there was no evidence available at the inquest of a referral to a dietician/nutritionist. There was to have been a referral to SALT in February but no trace could be found of the referral; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably refer patients to required specialist services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clerking and risk assessment of frail elderly transfer patients out of hours

Wider context from the report

“1. Mary Jones was a frail elderly lady who was moved from the MRI to Trafford General post-operatively for rehabilitation under the Trust structure. It was a planned transfer. However due to limited transport availability she arrived at Trafford General out of hours after waiting for transfer. As a result she was clerked in and risk assessed out of hours despite the recognised risks of moving frail elderly patients out of hours. The inquest was told that this is not uncommon as transfers such as these are made via ambulance and are a low priority and moved where needed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable admission assessment of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor-quality nursing documentation of fluid charts

Wider context from the report

“3. The documentation within the nursing notes, particularly the fluid charts was poor quality, making it difficult to understand what had happened in relation to the hydration of Mrs Jones; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable recording of fluid balance information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer frail patients to a dietician or nutritionist

Wider context from the report

“5. Despite her frailty there was no evidence available at the inquest of a referral to a dietician/nutritionist. There was to have been a referral to SALT in February but no trace could be found of the referral; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably refer patients to required specialist services.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.