PFD report

Katrina Veronica Francesca Insley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Feb 2025•Worcestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical handover processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of care information and responsibilityPart of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
  2. Failure to provide the Neighbourhood Team with direct access to hospital records for patients with pressure sores
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of pressure ulcersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Develop a handover form containing wound-care advice drawn from electronic patient-record and Tissue Viability records.

    Stated by Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2025.
  2. Action

    Send the wound-care handover form home with discharged patients for sharing with professionals providing care at home.

    Stated by Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2025.
  3. Action

    Review access uptake after all identified staff receive access and determine whether additional electronic patient-record licences are required.

    Stated by Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team

Wider context from the report

“(1) The absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team and the fact that the NT cannot simply check hospital records of patients with pressure sores to verify their condition without specifically requesting records creates the potential for the NT to fail to appreciate the true condition of a patient’s pressure sores when they are discharged from hospital and follow up to be delayed. This increases the risk of wound infection and consequent sepsis. (2) I am informed (letter received from HWHT on 31.1.25) that there are established handover procedures and that a statement of practice is being drafted to “formalise” the referral requirements between hospital and NT. I am informed also that an App is being developed which can be used to record and check the condition of pressure sores and that it has the potential to be used across acute and community services. I do not consider that these proposals are sufficiently detailed, precise and concluded to address the concerns that I have expressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical handover processes; Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility; Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide the Neighbourhood Team with direct access to hospital records for patients with pressure sores

Wider context from the report

“(1) The absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team and the fact that the NT cannot simply check hospital records of patients with pressure sores to verify their condition without specifically requesting records creates the potential for the NT to fail to appreciate the true condition of a patient’s pressure sores when they are discharged from hospital and follow up to be delayed. This increases the risk of wound infection and consequent sepsis. (2) I am informed (letter received from HWHT on 31.1.25) that there are established handover procedures and that a statement of practice is being drafted to “formalise” the referral requirements between hospital and NT. I am informed also that an App is being developed which can be used to record and check the condition of pressure sores and that it has the potential to be used across acute and community services. I do not consider that these proposals are sufficiently detailed, precise and concluded to address the concerns that I have expressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of pressure ulcers; Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a handover form containing wound-care advice drawn from electronic patient-record and Tissue Viability records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Acute Trust have developed a handover form (copy attached), which will detail wound care advice taken from the information on ‘Sunrise’ within the nursing and Tissue Viability records. This will be sent home with the patient and therefore will be available for them to share with professionals who attend their home, as an additional source of information alongside the Electronic Patient Record system.”

Source location

Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send the wound-care handover form home with discharged patients for sharing with professionals providing care at home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Acute Trust have developed a handover form (copy attached), which will detail wound care advice taken from the information on ‘Sunrise’ within the nursing and Tissue Viability records. This will be sent home with the patient and therefore will be available for them to share with professionals who attend their home, as an additional source of information alongside the Electronic Patient Record system.”

Source location

Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review access uptake after all identified staff receive access and determine whether additional electronic patient-record licences are required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“So far, 18 out of the 26 people identified as needing access, have been granted access but are not yet in full operational use. Once all access has been obtained as planned, this will be reviewed quickly to establish whether more licenses are required.”

Source location

Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain electronic patient-record access for two staff members per Neighbourhood Team, including evening and night community nursing teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trusts have further considered the impact of not having a shared records system, and the Health and Care Trust are in the process of obtaining access for 2 members of staff per Neighbourhood team (including Evening and Nights community nursing team) to the Acute Trusts Electronic Patient Record – ‘Sunrise’. The access will be given to staff who sit within Triage hubs in the Neighbourhood Teams and triage new referrals. This will enable them to gain detailed patient information, for example, regarding wounds.”

Source location

Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026