PFD report

Milly ZEMMEL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Apr 2016•Manchester City

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to initiate appropriate one-to-one supervision and observations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain required continuous patient observation
  2. Inadequate internal investigation of failures in basic medical care
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Failure to hand over important clinical information to the next shift
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable shift handover processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. Action

    Launch and disseminate the Clinical Communication and Handover Policy with structured escalation and handover documentation.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 April 2016.
  2. Action

    Introduce the Enhanced Patient Observation Policy to guide safe supervision and observation of adult in-patients.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 April 2016.
  3. Action

    Conduct quarterly audits of compliance with the Clinical Communication and Handover Policy.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 April 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to initiate appropriate one-to-one supervision and observations

Wider context from the report

“4. There was a gross failure to initiate appropriate one to one supervision and observations for the deceased from the early hours of the morning on 1 March 2015. In addition there was a failure to ensure that important clinical information about the deceased’s condition was handed over to the next shift. Nor did the next shift nurse in charge ensure that the deceased’s records were checked to find out what the up to date information on the situation was. Consequently the deceased, who was suffering an acute confusional state, and who was blind was left unsupervised for several hours leading her to have a fall and suffer a serious injury which caused or contributed to her death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain required continuous patient observation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate internal investigation of failures in basic medical care

Wider context from the report

“1. The Trust’s own internal investigative procedures were demonstrably inadequate because the internal hospital investigation did not fully and properly identify the gross failure to provide the deceased with the basic medical care which her condition obviously required on the morning of 1 March 2015. The full particulars only became apparent when evidence was heard at the inquest and the records were checked. The gravity of the failings in care had not been properly identified. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to hand over important clinical information to the next shift

Wider context from the report

“4. There was a gross failure to initiate appropriate one to one supervision and observations for the deceased from the early hours of the morning on 1 March 2015. In addition there was a failure to ensure that important clinical information about the deceased’s condition was handed over to the next shift. Nor did the next shift nurse in charge ensure that the deceased’s records were checked to find out what the up to date information on the situation was. Consequently the deceased, who was suffering an acute confusional state, and who was blind was left unsupervised for several hours leading her to have a fall and suffer a serious injury which caused or contributed to her death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable shift handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess and correctly apply the falls risk policy

Wider context from the report

“2. There have been failures to assess and correctly apply the then existing falls risk policy. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate required clinical review after a fall

Wider context from the report

“3. There was a failure to escalate the requirement for a clinical review following her fall on 21 February 2015 and nor was this identified at handovers on several occasions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to check patient records for up-to-date information at shift change

Wider context from the report

“4. There was a gross failure to initiate appropriate one to one supervision and observations for the deceased from the early hours of the morning on 1 March 2015. In addition there was a failure to ensure that important clinical information about the deceased’s condition was handed over to the next shift. Nor did the next shift nurse in charge ensure that the deceased’s records were checked to find out what the up to date information on the situation was. Consequently the deceased, who was suffering an acute confusional state, and who was blind was left unsupervised for several hours leading her to have a fall and suffer a serious injury which caused or contributed to her death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable shift handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch and disseminate the Clinical Communication and Handover Policy with structured escalation and handover documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust launched a policy for Clinical Communication and Handover in September 2015 which includes handover documentation templates with more robust information for recording safety concerns such as a patient who may be at risk of falls information and a standard framework for escalating concerns about a patient. The policy also includes the standard required for doctor to doctor handovers including for patients who have been referred and who need to be assessed. The policy has been disseminated across the clinical teams in the Trust and the senior nursing team undertake quarterly audits to assess the quality and level of compliance. This policy is within Appendix 3 - Clinical Communication and Handover Policy.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce the Enhanced Patient Observation Policy to guide safe supervision and observation of adult in-patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Enhanced Patient Observation Policy was also introduced in February 2016 to ensure patient safety and to help provide the appropriate level of supervision and observation for adult in-patients. This policy provides advice and support to staff on the different requirements and needs of patients who require observation. This can be found in Appendix 6 - Enhanced Patient Observation Policy.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct quarterly audits of compliance with the Clinical Communication and Handover Policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust launched a policy for Clinical Communication and Handover in September 2015 which includes handover documentation templates with more robust information for recording safety concerns such as a patient who may be at risk of falls information and a standard framework for escalating concerns about a patient. The policy also includes the standard required for doctor to doctor handovers including for patients who have been referred and who need to be assessed. The policy has been disseminated across the clinical teams in the Trust and the senior nursing team undertake quarterly audits to assess the quality and level of compliance. This policy is within Appendix 3 - Clinical Communication and Handover Policy.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an investigation toolkit covering investigation processes and report preparation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• To accompany the RCA training programme the Clinical Governance team have also developed an investigation toolkit that covers all aspects of investigations and advice on preparing and writing investigation reports.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require nursing staff to escalate urgent medical reviews through the specified clinical escalation route and use the SBAR communication tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Failure to act and escalate the lack of medical review will be included in the Lessons Learned Bulletin within the Medical Division and disseminated to all wards and departments across the division. The learning for nursing staff is to escalate to the medical team and in the first instance to the registrar and then consultant or on call Consultant, with assistance if required from within the senior nursing site team or on call/ bleep holder out of hours to ensure that any request for urgent review occurs. Staff will be required to use the communication handover SBAR tool (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) to support any communication. This is contained within the Clinical Communication and Handover Policy.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train 103 staff, including senior clinicians and managers, in root cause analysis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A two day programme of root cause analysis training was commissioned by an external company specialising in root cause analysis (RCA) training and 103 staff, including senior clinicians and managers, were trained during 2015/16. In addition the Trust delivered training on Duty of Candour (being open) to ensure that patients and families receive support and feedback when a serious incident investigation is commenced. An internal programme of investigation training will continue throughout 2016/17 to ensure that the quality and breadth of Trust investigations continues to improve.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include learning about failures to obtain and escalate medical review in the Medical Division Lessons Learned Bulletin and disseminate it across wards and departments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Dissemination of Lessons Learned”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 3 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce Safety Huddles at the start of ward and departmental shifts to discuss incidents, safety issues and enhanced observation needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has piloted and now introduced a ‘Safety Huddle’ at the commencement of each ward and departmental shift which includes the discussion and handover of any recent incidents, as well as safety issues relating to patients. This includes a prompt for discussion of any patients who will require additional observation or enhanced supervision as part of their care. This allows nursing staff to report on any unexpected and significant events involving patients and helps them to proactively plan and agree how to resolve them. The policy is within Appendix 2 - Safety Huddle document.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and launch the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy and require independent investigation teams for serious incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was recognised early in 2015 that the Trust need to make improvements in how investigations were conducted within the organisation. An external review of serious incident investigations was commissioned by the former Chief Executive and following this review the Trust instigated a number of actions:”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 1 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce the Fallsafe Policy with assessment, care-planning and care-bundle tools, supported by staff training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new Fallsafe Policy for the prevention and management of in-patient falls was introduced in April 2016; this includes newly launched tools for assessment, care planning and a care bundle. As part of the launch, training was included using the Fallsafe resources produced by the Royal College of Physicians and is available to all staff.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue the internal investigation training programme throughout 2016/17.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A two day programme of root cause analysis training was commissioned by an external company specialising in root cause analysis (RCA) training and 103 staff, including senior clinicians and managers, were trained during 2015/16. In addition the Trust delivered training on Duty of Candour (being open) to ensure that patients and families receive support and feedback when a serious incident investigation is commenced. An internal programme of investigation training will continue throughout 2016/17 to ensure that the quality and breadth of Trust investigations continues to improve.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Employ two falls specialist practitioners to enhance staff education and training and develop falls-management systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has now employed two Specialist Practitioners for falls to further enhance and develop the systems and processes for the education and training of staff. Part of their work will be to develop the processes for patient risk assessment and for auditing the implementation and effectiveness of the policy in clinical areas. The Fallsafe Policy is in Appendix 4 and the Fallsafe staff information booklet is within at Appendix 5.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop patient risk-assessment processes and audit Fallsafe Policy implementation and effectiveness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has now employed two Specialist Practitioners for falls to further enhance and develop the systems and processes for the education and training of staff. Part of their work will be to develop the processes for patient risk assessment and for auditing the implementation and effectiveness of the policy in clinical areas. The Fallsafe Policy is in Appendix 4 and the Fallsafe staff information booklet is within at Appendix 5.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Deliver Duty of Candour training to support patients and families during serious incident investigations.

    Stated by Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 April 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Duty of Candour training to support patients and families during serious incident investigations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A two day programme of root cause analysis training was commissioned by an external company specialising in root cause analysis (RCA) training and 103 staff, including senior clinicians and managers, were trained during 2015/16. In addition the Trust delivered training on Duty of Candour (being open) to ensure that patients and families receive support and feedback when a serious incident investigation is commenced. An internal programme of investigation training will continue throughout 2016/17 to ensure that the quality and breadth of Trust investigations continues to improve.”

Source location

2016-0139-Response-Pennine-Acute-Hospitals
Page 2 · response
Published 6 April 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026