PFD report

Peter Jonathan Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Mar 2015•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of out-of-hours doctor cover at the hospital
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient carePart of recurring concern: Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours
  2. Insufficient ward staffing for the patient workload
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
  3. Failure to conduct drugs rounds in accordance with the requirement for more than one staff member
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Conduct nurse staffing establishment reviews at least every six months using quality, workload and professional-judgment data, with recommendations reviewed by the Trust Board.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 March 2015.
  2. Action

    Provide non-nursing clinical staff on the ward to undertake duties including therapeutic interventions.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 March 2015.
  3. Action

    Provide Brocton Ward with a minimum staffing establishment of four, four and three, including two registered nurses on duty at all times, and deploy additional staff when acuity increases.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 March 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing staffing reviews, minimum ward establishments and additional staff deployment are considered sufficient to manage patient acuity and staffing needs.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of out-of-hours doctor cover at the hospital

Wider context from the report

“(2) At the time of this incident there was still a 24 hour Emergency Department at the nearby Stafford Hospital and at St George’s Hospital there was no doctor on site. Now the Emergency Department at County (formerly Stafford) Hospital is not open during the night and the nearest ED is at Stoke. I was told that the situation can be managed by calling paramedics. While I appreciate that nearly all the doctors at St George’s are psychiatrists not medics I wonder if any consideration has been given to out of hours cover by a doctor? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient ward staffing for the patient workload

Wider context from the report

“(1) At the time of the death the ward was understaffed. Of the quota staff of three, one care assistant had been called to assist in another ward (and had in fact just returned) and one care assistant was with another patient who required continuous observation. This left just the qualified nurse to deal with 16 patients. She did not record all necessary observations and was doing a drugs round by herself (contrary to policy). This was recognised in the SIR carried out by ████████ but no recommendation was made about it on the basis that the Trust was undergoing a major staffing review in any event. It may therefore be that the situation has already been addressed but this was not clear to me at the Inquest and the impression I received from the nurse was that there is now some extra support at times but it is still not satisfactory. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct drugs rounds in accordance with the requirement for more than one staff member

Wider context from the report

“(1) At the time of the death the ward was understaffed. Of the quota staff of three, one care assistant had been called to assist in another ward (and had in fact just returned) and one care assistant was with another patient who required continuous observation. This left just the qualified nurse to deal with 16 patients. She did not record all necessary observations and was doing a drugs round by herself (contrary to policy). This was recognised in the SIR carried out by ████████ but no recommendation was made about it on the basis that the Trust was undergoing a major staffing review in any event. It may therefore be that the situation has already been addressed but this was not clear to me at the Inquest and the impression I received from the nurse was that there is now some extra support at times but it is still not satisfactory. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record all necessary patient observations

Wider context from the report

“(1) At the time of the death the ward was understaffed. Of the quota staff of three, one care assistant had been called to assist in another ward (and had in fact just returned) and one care assistant was with another patient who required continuous observation. This left just the qualified nurse to deal with 16 patients. She did not record all necessary observations and was doing a drugs round by herself (contrary to policy). This was recognised in the SIR carried out by ████████ but no recommendation was made about it on the basis that the Trust was undergoing a major staffing review in any event. It may therefore be that the situation has already been addressed but this was not clear to me at the Inquest and the impression I received from the nurse was that there is now some extra support at times but it is still not satisfactory. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct nurse staffing establishment reviews at least every six months using quality, workload and professional-judgment data, with recommendations reviewed by the Trust Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust undertakes nurse staffing establishment reviews for each of our in-patient ward areas on at least a six-monthly basis. In undertaking these reviews, the Trust uses:”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 1 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide non-nursing clinical staff on the ward to undertake duties including therapeutic interventions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“with additional staff being deployed to meet any increased acuity. There are also non-nursing clinical staff who will be present on the ward undertaking other duties – examples will include medical and allied health professionals providing therapeutic interventions.”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Brocton Ward with a minimum staffing establishment of four, four and three, including two registered nurses on duty at all times, and deploy additional staff when acuity increases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For 2015/16 Brocton Ward staffing establishment is 4/4/3 (with two registered nurses on duty at all times). This is the minimum level which can be expected on the ward”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 1 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing staffing reviews, minimum ward establishments and additional staff deployment are considered sufficient to manage patient acuity and staffing needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust undertakes nurse staffing establishment reviews for each of our in-patient ward areas on at least a six-monthly basis. In undertaking these reviews, the Trust uses:”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 1 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paramedics are considered best placed to provide advanced emergency support and stabilisation before transfer to hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Every clinical and non-clinical area has first aid in place and wards are stocked with equipment for managing common emergencies. We do however recognise that more sophisticated medical equipment and support may be required at times, and in the case of a medical emergency we expect staff to call 999 without delay, as this is what people in the community would do in similar circumstances.”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Non-resident medical cover, trained staff, emergency equipment, basic life support and 999 access are considered sufficient for out-of-hours medical emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust does not have resident doctors on call but operates a non-resident out of hour’s rota to comply with European Working Time Directive.”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Train medical and nursing staff in basic life support through mandatory training, with some staff holding intermediate or advanced skills.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 March 2015.
  2. 2

    Maintain first-aid provision in every clinical and non-clinical area and stock wards with equipment for managing common emergencies.

    Stated by Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 March 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train medical and nursing staff in basic life support through mandatory training, with some staff holding intermediate or advanced skills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our medical and nursing staff are all trained in basic life support as part of mandatory training and some have intermediate and advanced skills.”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain first-aid provision in every clinical and non-clinical area and stock wards with equipment for managing common emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Every clinical and non-clinical area has first aid in place and wards are stocked with equipment for managing common emergencies. We do however recognise that more sophisticated medical equipment and support may be required at times, and in the case of a medical emergency we expect staff to call 999 without delay, as this is what people in the community would do in similar circumstances.”

Source location

2015-0073-Response-by-South-Staffordshire-Shropshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust1
Page 2 · response
Published 2 March 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026