PFD report

Allan Richard Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Oct 2015•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
10

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised10

  1. Failure to complete documentation contemporaneously
  2. Lack of staff awareness of the Falls Prevention Policy
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  3. Failure to escalate falls to appropriate senior staff
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to promptly escalate patient falls to responsible senior clinicians and managersPart of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete documentation contemporaneously

Wider context from the report

“(4) Documentation is not completed contemporaneously but at the end of the shift. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff awareness of the Falls Prevention Policy

Wider context from the report

“(1) Staff were unaware of the Home’s Falls Prevention Policy. This meant staff failed to correctly record falls and escalate to appropriate senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate falls to appropriate senior staff

Wider context from the report

“(1) Staff were unaware of the Home’s Falls Prevention Policy. This meant staff failed to correctly record falls and escalate to appropriate senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to promptly escalate patient falls to responsible senior clinicians and managers; Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of senior staff to correctly review falls incident forms

Wider context from the report

“(8) The falls incident forms were not correctly reviewed by senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably follow up accident reports to prevent recurrence; Unreliable senior oversight of safety incident reviews.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate completion of 15 minute observation forms

Wider context from the report

“(3) 15 minute observation forms were found to be inaccurate as staff in the office were completing the form when not seeing the patient. In addition the observation forms were felt to be inaccurate as a member of staff signed for observations when it was found they were undertaking another task. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Policy of treating a resident’s first fall as isolated without further action

Wider context from the report

“(5) The home has a policy that the first fall of a resident is treated as an isolated incident and no further action is taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete the falls tracker

Wider context from the report

“(7) The falls tracker was not completed for Mr Beasley. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete the falls monthly log daily

Wider context from the report

“(2) The falls monthly log was not completed on a daily basis as it should have been. The log was not completed for June as staff were too busy. This resulted in trends being missed and staff being unaware of the frequency of Mr Beasley’s falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Policy of delaying escalation to the falls team until three falls

Wider context from the report

“(6) The home has a policy that they only escalate to the falls team if a resident has had 3 falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to correctly record falls

Wider context from the report

“(1) Staff were unaware of the Home’s Falls Prevention Policy. This meant staff failed to correctly record falls and escalate to appropriate senior staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable documentation of falls and related clinical response.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.