PFD report

David Bassett COOPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Dec 2016•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of comprehensive transfer handover of falls risk
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of care information and responsibilityPart of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
  2. Shortcomings in booking additional staff for 1:1 care
  3. Failure to integrate and respond to the whole picture of ongoing falls risk
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Incomplete consideration of relevant factors in falls risk assessments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Continue Falls Management Group scrutiny of training, individual falls reviews and performance data.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 February 2017.
  2. Action

    Introduce National Patient Safety Agency falls risk assessments.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Falls management is devolved to directly managed units, while the Falls Management Group retains scrutiny and performance-review functions.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of comprehensive transfer handover of falls risk

Wider context from the report

“1. When transfers between wards took place, the evidence revealed that there was a lack of comprehensive hand-over by the transferring ward to the receiving ward especially in terms of identifying the patient’s risk of falls. For example, on ward 18 Mr Cooper was in receipt of ‘1:1’ nursing care, but on transfer to ward 21, not only was that never given, but the evidence suggested it was not considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility; Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortcomings in booking additional staff for 1:1 care

Wider context from the report

“4. As with many other cases involving patients at high risk of falls, the evidence revealed shortcomings in the system used for booking additional staff to provide ‘1:1’ care, revealing a system which left front line nursing staff unable to cope with the challenges in looking after the most vulnerable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to integrate and respond to the whole picture of ongoing falls risk

Wider context from the report

“3. The evidence revealed that there was a distinct lack of “joined up” thinking and a failure to see the “whole picture”. Mr Cooper’s risk of falling was as high when he was admitted in October 2015 as it was when he died in March 2016, but still he sustained 9 falls. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Incomplete consideration of relevant factors in falls risk assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate and incomplete nursing notes and falls records

Wider context from the report

“2. The accuracy and completeness of nursing notes and records left much to be desired. For example, on Ward 21 when he fell three times, there was no entry made in the Falls Diary – a document which was supposed to act as a tool for nursing staff to assess whether there was a pattern to the numerous falls being sustained – save for the last fall on 5th March. This deprived staff of the opportunity to see the ‘whole picture’ and to take into consideration the eight falls which he had sustained up to that point. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable documentation of falls and related clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue Falls Management Group scrutiny of training, individual falls reviews and performance data.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Falls Management Group will continue to meet as a scrutiny panel to ensure that appropriate training and individual falls scrutiny is being undertaken along with continued review of performance data. ████████ Consultant Physician and Geriatrician, will be leading the Falls Management Group.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce National Patient Safety Agency falls risk assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board established a Falls Management Group in September 2015. This was a task and finish group that reviewed policies and training requirements in relation to falls management. The Health Board introduced the National Patient Safety Agency’s Risk Assessments and I enclose the Health Board’s Falls Policy and other supporting information for your review. The Falls Management Group last met in December 2016 and devolved falls management to the Directly Managed Units to ensure clinical orientation and responsibility.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Falls management is devolved to directly managed units, while the Falls Management Group retains scrutiny and performance-review functions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board established a Falls Management Group in September 2015. This was a task and finish group that reviewed policies and training requirements in relation to falls management. The Health Board introduced the National Patient Safety Agency’s Risk Assessments and I enclose the Health Board’s Falls Policy and other supporting information for your review. The Falls Management Group last met in December 2016 and devolved falls management to the Directly Managed Units to ensure clinical orientation and responsibility.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Assign a Consultant Physician and Geriatrician to lead the Falls Management Group.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2017.
  2. 2

    Establish and operate a Falls Management Group to review falls policies, training requirements and performance.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2017.
  3. 3

    Devolve falls management to Directly Managed Units for clinical orientation and responsibility.

    Stated by Swansea Bay University Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assign a Consultant Physician and Geriatrician to lead the Falls Management Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Falls Management Group will continue to meet as a scrutiny panel to ensure that appropriate training and individual falls scrutiny is being undertaken along with continued review of performance data. ████████ Consultant Physician and Geriatrician, will be leading the Falls Management Group.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and operate a Falls Management Group to review falls policies, training requirements and performance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board established a Falls Management Group in September 2015. This was a task and finish group that reviewed policies and training requirements in relation to falls management. The Health Board introduced the National Patient Safety Agency’s Risk Assessments and I enclose the Health Board’s Falls Policy and other supporting information for your review. The Falls Management Group last met in December 2016 and devolved falls management to the Directly Managed Units to ensure clinical orientation and responsibility.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Devolve falls management to Directly Managed Units for clinical orientation and responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health Board established a Falls Management Group in September 2015. This was a task and finish group that reviewed policies and training requirements in relation to falls management. The Health Board introduced the National Patient Safety Agency’s Risk Assessments and I enclose the Health Board’s Falls Policy and other supporting information for your review. The Falls Management Group last met in December 2016 and devolved falls management to the Directly Managed Units to ensure clinical orientation and responsibility.”

Source location

2016-0459-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026