PFD report

Clive GOULD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2013•Oxfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to allocate appropriate priorities to ambulance calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triagePart of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance response-time standards and prioritisationPart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  2. Insufficient operational resilience to personnel absence or sudden sickness
  3. Failure to provide callers with accurate information about ambulance arrival delays
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Start ambulance crews earlier to bridge the identified morning demand gap.

    Stated by South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2013.
  2. Action

    Extend Rapid Response Vehicle cover to 24 hours across Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire.

    Stated by South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2013.
  3. Action

    Continue developing demand forecasting to improve resource planning.

    Stated by South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 December 2013.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    No estimated response times are communicated because dynamic priorities may require resources to be diverted to more time-critical incidents.

    Stated by South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to allocate appropriate priorities to ambulance calls

Wider context from the report

“(1) The original call made by ████████ was allocated a priority green status which meant that should a higher priority call be received (a red status call) then an ambulance would be diverted, which is what happened on two occasions. An internal audit of that call suggests that a different priority could have been given to the original call and the presenting concerns of Mr Gould's status. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage; Unreliable ambulance response-time standards and prioritisation; Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient operational resilience to personnel absence or sudden sickness

Wider context from the report

“(2) In evidence before the inquest SCAS indicated that there was little resilience in the system to tolerate absence or sudden sickness of personnel at certain times. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide callers with accurate information about ambulance arrival delays

Wider context from the report

“(3) The evidence from the family at the inquest was that they were informed that an ambulance would be arriving shortly. Had they known that there was to be the delays that occurred because other calls had been given priority, they informed me that they could have used first aid resources available to them within the village, such as locally trained first aiders etc. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of ambulance dispatch status and expectations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Start ambulance crews earlier to bridge the identified morning demand gap.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Rota match versus demand has also been reviewed with crews now starting duty earlier in the morning to bridge an identified gap. The forecasting demand approach has continued to be developed and is working within reasonable levels of tolerance of accuracy enabling resources to be effectively planned. We are also about to commence co-responding pilots with the Fire Service in both Oxford and Buckinghamshire which will further enhance our capacity to respond particularly in the rural areas.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend Rapid Response Vehicle cover to 24 hours across Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire.

Verbatim wording from the response

“SCAS response A review has been undertaken of overnight cover and Rapid Response Vehicle cover has now been extended to 24 hours in Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire. This will provide additional resilience against short term sickness and wider geographical deployment cover in rural areas overnight.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue developing demand forecasting to improve resource planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Rota match versus demand has also been reviewed with crews now starting duty earlier in the morning to bridge an identified gap. The forecasting demand approach has continued to be developed and is working within reasonable levels of tolerance of accuracy enabling resources to be effectively planned. We are also about to commence co-responding pilots with the Fire Service in both Oxford and Buckinghamshire which will further enhance our capacity to respond particularly in the rural areas.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commence co-responding pilots with the Fire Service in Oxford and Buckinghamshire.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Rota match versus demand has also been reviewed with crews now starting duty earlier in the morning to bridge an identified gap. The forecasting demand approach has continued to be developed and is working within reasonable levels of tolerance of accuracy enabling resources to be effectively planned. We are also about to commence co-responding pilots with the Fire Service in both Oxford and Buckinghamshire which will further enhance our capacity to respond particularly in the rural areas.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transition from AMPDS to the clinically focused NHS Pathways assessment system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“SCAS have recognised that AMPDS is a dispatch tool as opposed to a clinical decision software support tool. SCAS are currently transitioning, with full support from our Commissioners, from the AMPDS system to a more clinically focused assessment system called NHS Pathways which is also fully licensed by the Department of Health. The benefits of this change will be to quickly identify patients in a life threatening situation and dispatch accordingly for those patients who are more time critical and then to allocate remaining resources only if clinically required to do so. This transition will be completed by the end of autumn 2014.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No estimated response times are communicated because dynamic priorities may require resources to be diverted to more time-critical incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“SCAS response SCAS has reviewed this point and conclude that as our 999 service is a dynamic response service, situations and priorities can change and diverting of resources to a more time critical incident can happen and must take priority. Currently no ambulance service communicates at the time of a call what their response time will be for this reason. SCAS have recognised that on occasions patients may experience a delay in response due to high levels of demand. In order to support patients SCAS have developed a Clinical Support Desk (CSD) within Emergency Operations Centre who will call back and support patients with further clinical advice until a response is on scene. The CSD are very experienced nurses and can support these patients and their families.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National-level arrangements determine ambulance response allocation through the licensed AMPDS triage system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“SCAS response Currently SCAS operates the Department of Health licensed 999 triage software system called AMPDS. As this is a licensed tool all ambulance responses are determined at a national level. As a Trust we are required to maintain our AMPDS licence and ensure that call audits are carried out on a pre-determined percentage of inbound call volumes. The AMPDS product has been developed by Priority Dispatch Corporation with a comprehensive training programme that is prescriptive in nature and in order to be compliant all our Emergency Call Takers are required to meet the training standards and are audited on a monthly basis. As we currently use AMPDS our Call Takers are required to ask a pre-determined set of verbatim questions.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Establish a Clinical Support Desk in the Emergency Operations Centre to provide delayed patients with callback clinical advice.

    Stated by South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2013.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a Clinical Support Desk in the Emergency Operations Centre to provide delayed patients with callback clinical advice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“SCAS response SCAS has reviewed this point and conclude that as our 999 service is a dynamic response service, situations and priorities can change and diverting of resources to a more time critical incident can happen and must take priority. Currently no ambulance service communicates at the time of a call what their response time will be for this reason. SCAS have recognised that on occasions patients may experience a delay in response due to high levels of demand. In order to support patients SCAS have developed a Clinical Support Desk (CSD) within Emergency Operations Centre who will call back and support patients with further clinical advice until a response is on scene. The CSD are very experienced nurses and can support these patients and their families.”

Source location

2013-0357-Response-by-South-Central-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026