Shiya Jonathan Barnard Collins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 31 Oct 2023•Newcastle and North Tyneside

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of the control-room computer system to allow clinician assessment and upgrading of calls during ongoing live calls
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely clinical review during ambulance call handlingPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Cleric Computer Services Limited

    Change records to open in read-only mode, requiring users to request a lock.

  2. Cleric Computer Services Limited

    Consult ambulance trust customers to explore potential system improvements.

  3. Cleric Computer Services Limited

    Streamline requests to release a record lock from one user to another.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Cleric Computer Services Limited

    The system did not wholly preclude clinician access or call upgrading because several built-in mechanisms could overcome a locked record.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. Cleric Computer Services Limited

    Record locks will remain because they are fundamental, while existing operational procedures handle circumstances involving locked calls.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the control-room computer system to allow clinician assessment and upgrading of calls during ongoing live calls

Wider context from the report

“(1) Seven calls were made to the North East Ambulance Service (following the initial call) indicating that Shiya Collins’ condition was deteriorating. Call handlers recognised the need for clinical input in order to facilitate a possible upgrade of the ambulance response to category 1. However, the locking facility on the Cleric computer system used in the control room precluded any clinician from assessing/upgrading the call because the system was locked and unable to be accessed whilst live calls relating to the case were ongoing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinical review during ambulance call handling; Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Change records to open in read-only mode, requiring users to request a lock.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have consulted with our customers (Ambulance Trusts) to explore potential improvements and we have agreed that minor changes will be implemented within the system:”

Source location

Response from North East Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 6 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult ambulance trust customers to explore potential system improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have consulted with our customers (Ambulance Trusts) to explore potential improvements and we have agreed that minor changes will be implemented within the system:”

Source location

Response from North East Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 6 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Streamline requests to release a record lock from one user to another.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have consulted with our customers (Ambulance Trusts) to explore potential improvements and we have agreed that minor changes will be implemented within the system:”

Source location

Response from North East Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 6 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The system did not wholly preclude clinician access or call upgrading because several built-in mechanisms could overcome a locked record.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The lock feature is important to protect the integrity of the call and to stop data conflicts, the record (call) is only locked to an operator while they are active in the call. While it is technically correct that a clinician is not able to re-triage a call whilst it is in a locked state, I hope that the information I have provided adequately addresses the concern that “the computer system precluded any clinician from accessing/upgrading the call because the system was locked” Within the capabilities and provision of the Cleric system there are several means through which the ‘locking’ issue was able to have been overcome.(described above).”

Source location

Response from North East Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 6 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record locks will remain because they are fundamental, while existing operational procedures handle circumstances involving locked calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to note that the above changes will not eliminate locks as they remain a fundamental mechanism within these types of system, they are minor amendments to streamline existing functionality. System users also have robust operational processes/procedures in place to handle such circumstances.”

Source location

Response from North East Ambulance Service
Page 3 · response
Published 6 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026