PFD report

Georgia Dehaney-Perkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Feb 2024•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Failure to discuss alcohol and medication interaction risks
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically significant medication risks to patients
  2. Failure to update risk assessments after alcohol consumption incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to update risk assessments after material changes or safety events
  3. Incomplete recording of alcohol consumption incidents after leave
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of significant incidents and disclosuresPart of recurring concern: Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Check assisted-bathroom handrail mechanisms every shift and conduct management, fixture, and ligature audits.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  2. Action

    Carry out room-suitability risk assessments on admission and obtain multidisciplinary information about self-harm history and associated risk factors.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  3. Action

    Review the incident sign-off process to improve completion of patient-safety Datix reports.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to discuss alcohol and medication interaction risks

Wider context from the report

“(2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically significant medication risks to patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update risk assessments after alcohol consumption incidents

Wider context from the report

“(2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to update risk assessments after material changes or safety events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incomplete recording of alcohol consumption incidents after leave

Wider context from the report

“(2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of significant incidents and disclosures; Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of risk assessment of room suitability for a patient with a self-harming history

Wider context from the report

“(1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. ████████. Staff found Ms Dehaney-Perkins and removed the ligature. a. Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a requirement for her) with a fault in the anti-ligature safety mechanism meant that the safety feature could not be implemented. b. There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission. c. The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting. d. The Trust Datix Report was incomplete ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to assess room suitability and safety before placement.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record agreed family medication-management mitigations in the discharge care plan

Wider context from the report

“(2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge documentation; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update and communicate fixed-point ligature risks in discharge planning

Wider context from the report

“(1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. ████████. Staff found Ms Dehaney-Perkins and removed the ligature. a. Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a requirement for her) with a fault in the anti-ligature safety mechanism meant that the safety feature could not be implemented. b. There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission. c. The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting. d. The Trust Datix Report was incomplete ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to act on family concerns about medication access after leaving home

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Home First Treatment Team attended a scheduled appointment on 4 September and Ms Dehaney-Perkins appeared stable and updated the risk assessment that the risk of self-harm remained significant when alcohol was consumed. No action was taken following a call raising some queries and concerns from family that evening that Ms Dehaney-Perkins had left her home with her medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to acknowledge and act on family and carer safety concerns in patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of an assisted-bathroom anti-ligature safety mechanism

Wider context from the report

“(1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. ████████. Staff found Ms Dehaney-Perkins and removed the ligature. a. Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a requirement for her) with a fault in the anti-ligature safety mechanism meant that the safety feature could not be implemented. b. There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission. c. The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting. d. The Trust Datix Report was incomplete ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incomplete incident reporting

Wider context from the report

“(1) On 28 August Ms Dehaney-Perkins was agitated and distressed on return to the ward from leave and had consumed alcohol that was known to increase her risk of self-harm. ████████. Staff found Ms Dehaney-Perkins and removed the ligature. a. Ms Dehaney-Perkins was admitted to a room with an assisted bathroom (this was not a requirement for her) with a fault in the anti-ligature safety mechanism meant that the safety feature could not be implemented. b. There was no risk assessment about the suitability of this room for Ms Dehaney-Perkins a patient with a self-harming history at the time of the admission. c. The fixed-point ligature was not appropriately updated in the risk assessment and was not discussed at a discharge planning meeting. d. The Trust Datix Report was incomplete ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check assisted-bathroom handrail mechanisms every shift and conduct management, fixture, and ligature audits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a prompt on the handover sheet to ensure that the Nurse In-Charge checks the handrails mechanism remains in a locked and upright position. This is checked and signed for every shift. Regular audit and assurance are completed by the Ward Manager and Ward Clerk to check that this is being completed. Regular inspections of all room fixtures including handrails are done as part of Ligature audits to ensure compliance with EPUT safety protocols.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out room-suitability risk assessments on admission and obtain multidisciplinary information about self-harm history and associated risk factors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thorough risk assessments are being carried out using EPUT risk assessment tools including suitability of rooms for all patients on admission. There is collaboration with mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, community mental health nurses, GP’s and social workers to gather comprehensive information regarding the patient’s history of self-harm and associated risk factors.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the incident sign-off process to improve completion of patient-safety Datix reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Matron has made urgent contact with the risk management team in relation to the Datix Report for this matter – the datix report was approved by the Patient Incident Team on 26th March 2024. A further review of the process is being undertaken to improve sign off where there is a patient safety incident.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer patients at high risk of alcohol misuse to drug and alcohol services and document discussions of alcohol-related medication risks with patients and, where consented, families.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: If a patient is identified as at high risk of alcohol misuse they are referred to the Drug and alcohol service. It is also discussed with the patient advising them of the risks of using alcohol whilst on medication. Where consent is given family are invited to ward reviews and discharge planning meetings and discussion around medication, risks and compliance is part of those meetings. This is documented in the patients’ notes.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support patients and carers who raise risk concerns by contacting patients, exploring concerns, and managing them accordingly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: The Home First Team will support patients and carers when they contact the team raising concerns around risk. The patient will be contacted by a member of the team who will explore the concern and manage it accordingly.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share discharge plans with involved professionals and consented families or carers, and prompt staff to check agreed medication plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to strengthen safety measures in relation to this concern the wards now have in place that post each discharge meeting, discharge plans are shared with all health professionals and family/carers (with consent) involved in the care of the patient. A prompt is now written in the diary to remind staff to check the discharge plan that has been agreed for that patient including medication plans.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake multidisciplinary discussions to develop and review individualised care plans and risk assessments during discharge planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The General Workplace Risk Assessment has been updated to include the fixed-point ligature. Multi-disciplinary team discussions are being undertaken to develop and to review individualised care plans and risk assessments as part of discharge planning.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the General Workplace Risk Assessment to include the fixed-point ligature.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The General Workplace Risk Assessment has been updated to include the fixed-point ligature. Multi-disciplinary team discussions are being undertaken to develop and to review individualised care plans and risk assessments as part of discharge planning.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete leave risk assessments, offer post-leave engagement, record incidents through Datix, update risk assessments, and share relevant information with involved professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A risk assessment is completed prior to a patient going on leave. Upon the patient returning from leave one to one engagement is offered to the patient, if any incident has occurred whilst the patient has been on leave this is reported via Datix and the risk assessment is updated accordingly. The incident is also documented within the patients’ notes and information is shared with all health professionals involved in the care of the patient during handover, Multidisciplinary Team meetings and ward reviews.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Remind staff to follow Trust policy and review assessments and clinical notes in supervision to improve risk-assessment and record-keeping quality.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  2. 2

    Monitor the stated safety provisions to assess their contribution to keeping patients safe and delivering therapeutic care.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  3. 3

    Complete admission risk assessments within four hours and reinforce completion through delegation, diary prompts, and daily dashboard monitoring.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 February 2024.
  4. 4

    Document assisted-bathroom risks in individual assessments and care plans, relocate patients at significant self-harm risk where possible, and audit compliance through supervision.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 14 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff to follow Trust policy and review assessments and clinical notes in supervision to improve risk-assessment and record-keeping quality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“If the carer has identified risk that is deemed to require further assessment / intervention, the Home First Team may consider whether a home visit is warranted and “cold call” the individual. This would be also with the assistance of the Crisis 24 Team where appropriate. All staff have been reminded about ensuring that they work according to trust policy and this has been discussed in the business meetings. Assessments and clinical notes are reviewed with individuals during their one to one supervision to focus on the quality of their record keeping including risk assessments.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the stated safety provisions to assess their contribution to keeping patients safe and delivering therapeutic care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope that I have provided reassurances around the steps that we have taken to address the issues of concern contained within your report. We appreciate that there is an acute need to embed and effect change, hence we will monitor the above provisions to ensure these are contributing to our overall aim of keeping patients safe and delivering therapeutic care.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete admission risk assessments within four hours and reinforce completion through delegation, diary prompts, and daily dashboard monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: All patients have a risk assessment completed within four hours of admission to the ward. This is monitored through the clinical dashboard daily by the Nurse in Charge. On admission the Nurse in Charge will delegate duties to ensure that all admission tasks are completed. Prompts have been added to the ward diary to remind staff to check that all tasks including risk assessments have been completed.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Document assisted-bathroom risks in individual assessments and care plans, relocate patients at significant self-harm risk where possible, and audit compliance through supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cherrydown Ward has two assisted bathrooms which have reduced ligature handrails. To reduce the risk of patients allocated to those rooms, the risks are documented in individual risk assessments and care plans. If a patient is at significant risk of self-harm the ward would attempt to relocate them to ensure that any high risk patients are not allocated to the assisted bathroom bedrooms. This will also be discussed in 1:1 support supervision and the monthly meetings with all qualified staff to ensure that this is taking place. Documentation will be audited at the 1:1 support supervision’s with those staff that have patients allocated to assisted bathroom bedrooms.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026