PFD report

BETTY ANNIE TADMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Feb 2021•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to consider fracture or internal bleeding during continued deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably assess and diagnose injuries
  2. Failure to conduct imaging after a fall to establish injury
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response
  3. Failure to conduct a serious incident investigation after a death
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Implement ED silver trauma screening for frail patients with low-energy trauma, including senior-clinician assessment where red flags require escalation.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 February 2021.
  2. Action

    Adopt the London Major Trauma System elderly-trauma screening and triage pathway prompting immediate senior-doctor assessment.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 February 2021.
  3. Action

    Have the Medical Examiner review post-mortem reports and route identified concerns through the Patient Safety and Learning from Deaths programmes.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 February 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The ambulance record documented a shortened leg without rotation, contrary to the inquest evidence.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider fracture or internal bleeding during continued deterioration

Wider context from the report

“5. There was no consideration of potential fracture or internal bleeding in the presence of dropping of haemoglobin and continued deterioration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess and diagnose injuries.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct imaging after a fall to establish injury

Wider context from the report

“3. Mrs Tadman was an elderly lady with a medical history of osteoporosis who fell from a standing height. No imaging was conducted on admission to hospital to establish if Mrs Tadman had sustained an injury. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct a serious incident investigation after a death

Wider context from the report

“6. The Trust did not conduct a serious incident investigation following Mrs Tadman’s death when the post-mortem cause of death established a pelvic fracture with severe haemorrhage. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that this case was not discussed at the trust morbidity and mortality review or any other forum giving rise to concerns that lessons had not been learned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider potential fracture injury

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was heard at the inquest that ambulance crew noted and handed over Mrs Tadman’s left leg was rotated but not shortened. Mrs Tadman could not stand or mobilise to use the commode in hospital. No consideration was given to a potential fracture injury. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess and diagnose injuries.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Over-reliance on absence of reported pain during physical examination

Wider context from the report

“4. Swelling in the calves gave rise to a suspicion of potential deep vein thrombosis and dalteparin was prescribed. Physical examination was over reliant on the lack of complaints of pain in a patient with dementia in the absence of imaging. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider the circumstances of a fall during clinical assessment

Wider context from the report

“1. Mrs Tadman had dementia and a long-term catheter who was admitted to hospital with a pre-alert for suspicion for urosepsis that was treated appropriately. However, urine dipstick tests were only positive for blood and consideration was not given to the circumstances in which she was found with a history of a fall. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisions; Incomplete clinical history-taking.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review cases and learn lessons through morbidity and mortality or other forums

Wider context from the report

“6. The Trust did not conduct a serious incident investigation following Mrs Tadman’s death when the post-mortem cause of death established a pelvic fracture with severe haemorrhage. Evidence heard at the inquest confirmed that this case was not discussed at the trust morbidity and mortality review or any other forum giving rise to concerns that lessons had not been learned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to learn from deaths through systematic review; Unreliable morbidity and mortality review processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement ED silver trauma screening for frail patients with low-energy trauma, including senior-clinician assessment where red flags require escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.3. The Trust is committed to implementing the “silver trauma” screening system in ED for frail patients presenting with ‘low energy’ trauma with an assessment led by a senior clinician (ST 4 +) if there are any red flags signs for escalation.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adopt the London Major Trauma System elderly-trauma screening and triage pathway prompting immediate senior-doctor assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.5. The Trust plans to adopt the London Major Trauma System; Management of Elderly Major Trauma Patients – Second Edition whereby trauma units use an effective screening triage tool on elderly patients who self-present or arrive by ambulance and this prompts an immediate senior doctor (ST4+ level ) review for assessment. Since November 2018, we have already introduced a “front door” team of specialist nurses to assess elderly frail patients upon arrival in ED to expedite their transfer to the ward or escalate for medical advice or discharge as appropriate.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Have the Medical Examiner review post-mortem reports and route identified concerns through the Patient Safety and Learning from Deaths programmes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6. Since publication in July 2018 of the National Quality Board (NHSE) Learning from Deaths Guidance, the Trust Board is committed to embedding a culture of learning and ensuring effective implementation of all aspects of learning from death. The Trust Mortality Team has initiated a system with the local Coroners Court to ensure all post mortem reports are now disclosed promptly following any patient’s death in hospital. The Medical Examiner also now reviews PM Reports, to ensure that any concerns are highlighted through the Trust’s Patient Safety programme via a link with the Trust Learning from Deaths Team. All post mortems will now be shared with the doctor making the referral to the Coroner and the responsible Consultant.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver staff teaching and simulated training on evidence-based trauma care for elderly patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.2. Prior to the Covid pandemic, extensive staff teaching and training had already been undertaken on improving trauma care of the elderly with a focus on the emerging evidence-based pathway of “silver trauma” care. This training programme, which included simulated exercises, is currently suspended but will be resumed shortly.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the case and learning at a multidisciplinary Grand Round, reminding clinicians to interpret D-Dimers with the recognised screening tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.4. The facts and identified failures in this matter will be presented as a case study at a Multi-disciplinary Grand Round session, as soon as they resume, for teaching purposes when clinicians will be reminded that D-Dimers are not to be used in isolation but in conjunction with the recognised screening tool.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a specialist-nurse front-door team to assess frail elderly patients arriving in ED and expedite transfer, escalation or discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.5. The Trust plans to adopt the London Major Trauma System; Management of Elderly Major Trauma Patients – Second Edition whereby trauma units use an effective screening triage tool on elderly patients who self-present or arrive by ambulance and this prompts an immediate senior doctor (ST4+ level ) review for assessment. Since November 2018, we have already introduced a “front door” team of specialist nurses to assess elderly frail patients upon arrival in ED to expedite their transfer to the ward or escalate for medical advice or discharge as appropriate.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Resume the suspended staff teaching and simulated training programme on elderly trauma care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.2. Prior to the Covid pandemic, extensive staff teaching and training had already been undertaken on improving trauma care of the elderly with a focus on the emerging evidence-based pathway of “silver trauma” care. This training programme, which included simulated exercises, is currently suspended but will be resumed shortly.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The ambulance record documented a shortened leg without rotation, contrary to the inquest evidence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.2. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that ambulance crew noted and handed over that Mrs Tadman’s left leg was rotated but not shortened. Mrs Tadman could not stand or mobilise to use the commode in hospital. No consideration was given to a potential fracture injury. (The Trust wishes to point out that in fact the ambulance record documented shortening but no rotation)”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Operate a system with the Coroner’s Court for prompt disclosure of hospital post-mortem reports.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 February 2021.
  2. 2

    Share all post-mortem reports with the referring doctor and responsible Consultant.

    Stated by Medway NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 February 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a system with the Coroner’s Court for prompt disclosure of hospital post-mortem reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6. Since publication in July 2018 of the National Quality Board (NHSE) Learning from Deaths Guidance, the Trust Board is committed to embedding a culture of learning and ensuring effective implementation of all aspects of learning from death. The Trust Mortality Team has initiated a system with the local Coroners Court to ensure all post mortem reports are now disclosed promptly following any patient’s death in hospital. The Medical Examiner also now reviews PM Reports, to ensure that any concerns are highlighted through the Trust’s Patient Safety programme via a link with the Trust Learning from Deaths Team. All post mortems will now be shared with the doctor making the referral to the Coroner and the responsible Consultant.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share all post-mortem reports with the referring doctor and responsible Consultant.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2.6. Since publication in July 2018 of the National Quality Board (NHSE) Learning from Deaths Guidance, the Trust Board is committed to embedding a culture of learning and ensuring effective implementation of all aspects of learning from death. The Trust Mortality Team has initiated a system with the local Coroners Court to ensure all post mortem reports are now disclosed promptly following any patient’s death in hospital. The Medical Examiner also now reviews PM Reports, to ensure that any concerns are highlighted through the Trust’s Patient Safety programme via a link with the Trust Learning from Deaths Team. All post mortems will now be shared with the doctor making the referral to the Coroner and the responsible Consultant.”

Source location

2021-0023-Response-from-Medway-Maritime-Hospital-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 4 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026