PFD report

Ernest Bacon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Aug 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
16

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Failure to review relevant clinical notes during assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions
  2. Failure to flag sepsis concerns in patient notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis
  3. Failure to escalate non-compliance with the sepsis policy
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsisPart of recurring concern: Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Continue working with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals will be educated and informed about updated national sepsis guidance.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  2. Action

    Publish a workforce plan containing independently verified 10- and 15-year forecasts for doctors, nurses and other professionals.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  3. Action

    Temporarily lift the cap on English medical school places for eligible students with 2020 or 2021 A-Level offers.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Overnight junior doctor cover exceeded Royal College of Physicians national guidance when the deterioration occurred.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review relevant clinical notes during assessment

Wider context from the report

“2. As a consequence of the availability of doctors he was not reviewed face to face but via telephone. His notes were not seen. The seriousness of his condition was not recognised and he was not flagged up on handover; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to flag sepsis concerns in patient notes

Wider context from the report

“4. The nursing team recognised that he was triggering for Sepsis but the notes were not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis policy was not escalated in accordance with Trust Policy. The reason for non-escalation was unclear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate non-compliance with the sepsis policy

Wider context from the report

“4. The nursing team recognised that he was triggering for Sepsis but the notes were not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis policy was not escalated in accordance with Trust Policy. The reason for non-escalation was unclear. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis; Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide face-to-face clinical review

Wider context from the report

“2. As a consequence of the availability of doctors he was not reviewed face to face but via telephone. His notes were not seen. The seriousness of his condition was not recognised and he was not flagged up on handover; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide face-to-face clinical assessment when clinically indicated.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of doctors for ward clinical reviews

Wider context from the report

“1. The Inquest heard that when Mr Bacon became unwell on 16th January the Trust was staffed at weekend/OOD doctor numbers. This meant that there were a very limited number of doctors available within the hospital when the ward staff asked for a clinical review when Mr Bacon triggered for sepsis on the NEWS2 system. The Inquest heard that the staffing numbers of doctors and reliance on junior doctors at weekend to cover the wards is part of the national staffing model; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in further clinical review after continued sepsis triggers

Wider context from the report

“3. The Trust Policy required he be treated for Sepsis. However he was not placed on the Sepsis pathway and a further review did not take place until a further doctor was asked to examine him at about 22.30 despite his NEWS2 score continuing to trigger for Sepsis; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinical care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise the seriousness of a patient's condition

Wider context from the report

“2. As a consequence of the availability of doctors he was not reviewed face to face but via telephone. His notes were not seen. The seriousness of his condition was not recognised and he was not flagged up on handover; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to place sepsis-triggering patients on the sepsis pathway

Wider context from the report

“3. The Trust Policy required he be treated for Sepsis. However he was not placed on the Sepsis pathway and a further review did not take place until a further doctor was asked to examine him at about 22.30 despite his NEWS2 score continuing to trigger for Sepsis; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to flag deteriorating patients during handover

Wider context from the report

“2. As a consequence of the availability of doctors he was not reviewed face to face but via telephone. His notes were not seen. The seriousness of his condition was not recognised and he was not flagged up on handover; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration; Unreliable clinical handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals will be educated and informed about updated national sepsis guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has launched a consultation on updating the NG51 guideline for sepsis, based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ statement. The consultation will run from 7 to 21 December and can be reached on NICE’s website. As updated national sepsis guidance is implemented, the Department along with NHS England will continue to work closely with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals, including nurses and community health workers, will be educated and informed on its use. The Department will also continue to work closely with colleagues in the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand, where appropriate, evidence and evaluation that can be commissioned to support best practice implementation of new guidance that is complemented by useful educational tools and awareness interventions.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a workforce plan containing independently verified 10- and 15-year forecasts for doctors, nurses and other professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, the Government has committed to publishing the workforce plan next year and this will include independently verified forecasts for the number of doctors, nurses and other professionals that will be needed in future, for 10- and 15-years’ time, taking full account of improvements in retention and productivity. This plan will help ensure that we have the right numbers of staff, with the right skills to transform and deliver high quality services fit for the future.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Temporarily lift the cap on English medical school places for eligible students with 2020 or 2021 A-Level offers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Government has funded 1,500 more medical school places each year for domestic students in England, which is a 25% increase over three years. This expansion was completed in September 2020 and has delivered over three new medical schools in England. We have seen the first graduates from this expansion enter foundation training in August 2022. Additionally, the Government temporarily lifted the cap on medical school places for students who completed A-Levels in 2020 and in 2021 and who had an offer from a university in”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand evidence and evaluation that may support implementation of new sepsis guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has launched a consultation on updating the NG51 guideline for sepsis, based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ statement. The consultation will run from 7 to 21 December and can be reached on NICE’s website. As updated national sepsis guidance is implemented, the Department along with NHS England will continue to work closely with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals, including nurses and community health workers, will be educated and informed on its use. The Department will also continue to work closely with colleagues in the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand, where appropriate, evidence and evaluation that can be commissioned to support best practice implementation of new guidance that is complemented by useful educational tools and awareness interventions.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fund 1,500 additional annual medical school places for domestic students in England, completing the expansion in September 2020.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Government has funded 1,500 more medical school places each year for domestic students in England, which is a 25% increase over three years. This expansion was completed in September 2020 and has delivered over three new medical schools in England. We have seen the first graduates from this expansion enter foundation training in August 2022. Additionally, the Government temporarily lifted the cap on medical school places for students who completed A-Levels in 2020 and in 2021 and who had an offer from a university in”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission NHS England to develop a 15-year NHS workforce plan addressing staffing numbers, skills, supply gaps and retention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to concerns regarding the NHS workforce, the Department has commissioned NHS England to develop a long-term plan for the NHS workforce for the next 15 years. This high-level long-term workforce plan will look at the mix and number of staff required across all parts of the country and will set out the actions and reforms that will be needed to reduce supply gaps and improve retention.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver sepsis awareness, training and dissemination activities through briefings, scenario sessions, toolbox talks and sharing learning with clinical teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has had a Trust wide a focus on World Sepsis Day which was held on the 13th September 2022. The Trust’s Safer Care team have held a focus on sepsis week which took place over the week of 12th -18th September 2022. The objective of the week was to raise the profile of sepsis throughout the organisation and to reiterate recognition and management of suspected sepsis. During the week results of the sepsis audit and a detailed action plan on the sepsis improvement work was shared at the Trust’s Grand Round and the Managing Deteriorating Patient Group. In addition to this, 7-minute briefings on recent sepsis incidents have been developed and are being shared across the Trust. The Safer Care team have also created sepsis related scenarios to engage teams in identifying red flags for sepsis and encourage adherence to the use of sepsis care bundles.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agree additional nursing posts to support sepsis identification, training and compliance across the organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The sepsis improvement work has also been reported to the Trust’s Quality and Governance Committee, which is chaired by a Non-Executive Director. As a direct action following this meeting additional nursing posts were agreed which will specifically support clinical teams in sepsis identification, training and compliance across the organisation.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct monthly internal spot-check audits of sepsis pathway compliance and report non-compliance through incident forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To provide internal assurance spot check audits have been implemented to specifically look at compliance with the sepsis pathway. The audits have commenced and include a review of 10 patients each month. Where compliance with the pathway has not been present, an incident form will be completed contemporaneously.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress a business case to increase junior-doctor provision and reduce reliance on locum and agency doctors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the Trust does acknowledge that the junior doctor rota meets national guidance it does need to be strengthened further to support increased activity and acuity in the ward areas. The Trust is currently progressing a business case to increase the level of junior doctor provision which also aims to reduce reliance on locum and agency doctors.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Trust-wide sepsis improvement programme covering recognition, Sepsis Care Bundle use, antibiotics, blood cultures and deteriorating-patient assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Immediately following the inquest touching the death of Mr. Bacon the Trust completed a retrospective root cause analysis investigation into the clinical care of Mr Bacon, and in particular the response to his raised National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and recognition of sepsis. This was also retrospectively reported on the Trust’s incident reporting electronic system. A number of learning points were identified as a result of the investigation and the findings have been used to support a Trust wide sepsis improvement plan.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a Trust-wide incident-reporting programme addressing incident and near-miss identification, reporting, learning and action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to this, there has been a Trust wide focus on incident reporting throughout the month of September 2022. This work has been underway across the organisation and is being led by the Assistant Director of Integrated Governance throughout, culminating in the Trust’s Patient Safety Conference on October 6th 2022. This programme of events and activities seeks to engage staff at all levels and focusses on identification of incidents or near misses, incident reporting, acting on and learning from incidents.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Overnight junior doctor cover exceeded Royal College of Physicians national guidance when the deterioration occurred.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On Sunday night 16th / 17th January 2022, the night when Mr. Bacon’s condition sadly deteriorated, the level of junior doctor cover for the medical wards overnight exceeded that set out in national guidance by the Royal College of Physicians (2018). The actual number of doctors on call at that time were three Tier 1 doctors and one Tier 2 doctor covering non-covid medical beds. At the time that Mr. Bacon died the Trust were experiencing a significant increase in clinical activity as they were responding to the Omicron Covid wave.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Procure a new Electronic Patient Record to replace Dedalus Lorenzo and support a longer-term electronic NEWS solution.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  2. 2

    Pilot the existing electronic NEWS application across surgical wards to improve recording speed and accuracy and eliminate calculation errors.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  3. 3

    Circulate incident trigger lists across the organisation and reinforce the importance of incident reporting.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  4. 4

    Review the NEWS scoring system and recording process to address risks from manual calculation and documentation.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Procure a new Electronic Patient Record to replace Dedalus Lorenzo and support a longer-term electronic NEWS solution.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When clinical observations are performed as part of NEWS the staff in the Trust are required to manually calculate and record the score. The Trust acknowledge that manual calculation and recording can be open to human error, therefore significant work has been undertaken to address this and I can confirm that the Trust is currently at the Pre-Market Stage of procuring a new Electronic Patient Record (EPR) to replace Dedalus Lorenzo in March 2025.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot the existing electronic NEWS application across surgical wards to improve recording speed and accuracy and eliminate calculation errors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the new EPR may provide a long term electronic NEWS solution in 2025, in the interim the plan is to deliver an inhouse electronic solution. The Trust has an embedded electronic NEWS application currently in use across our Emergency Department (eNEWS). The agreed proposal is a pilot of the eNEWS application across our surgical wards with a view to improving the accuracy and speed of data recording, and to eliminate errors in early score warning calculation. We are aiming to commence the pilot prior to December 2022.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate incident trigger lists across the organisation and reinforce the importance of incident reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the time of Mr Bacon’s death, the delay in recognising and treating his sepsis was not reported on the Trust’s electronic reporting system. As a result of your concerns outlined above in relation to incidents, the Trust’s incident trigger lists have been circulated widely throughout the organisation with a reiteration of the importance of incident reporting.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the NEWS scoring system and recording process to address risks from manual calculation and documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Along with the sepsis improvement project, the Trust has also been reviewing the NEWS scoring system and how this is recorded. The NEWS score is a well established physiological scoring tool which was introduced at the Trust many years ago. The NEWS tool has an established training package in place for clinical staff and compliance with the tool is part of the regular Trust audit program. Compliance with the tool is monitored via the Deteriorating Patient group which reports directly into the Executive Lead Service Quality Assurance Group.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026