PFD report

Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Oct 2017•North West Wales

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to commence heparin when DVT or PE is a differential diagnosis
  2. Discharge decisions made without involvement of a clinician responsible for the patient's care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Failure to provide safety-netting instructions for worsening condition
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to commence heparin when DVT or PE is a differential diagnosis

Wider context from the report

“(6) Heparin was not commenced even though a DVT /PE was one differential diagnosis ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discharge decisions made without involvement of a clinician responsible for the patient's care

Wider context from the report

“(3) Mr Willans appears to have been discharged by a Nurse Practioner ████████ who had no involvement in the care of Mr Willans. ████████, or any other doctor does not appear to have been involved in the discharge of Mr Willans. Nurse Practitioner Jones adds another diagnosis to the GP letter over and above that of her colleague despite never seeing the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide safety-netting instructions for worsening condition

Wider context from the report

“(4) There is insufficient safety netting for this patient. He was not told what to do in the event of a worsening of his condition. The letter to the GP was faxed the day after discharge by which time he had died ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Addition of diagnoses to clinical correspondence without examining the patient

Wider context from the report

“(3) Mr Willans appears to have been discharged by a Nurse Practioner ████████ who had no involvement in the care of Mr Willans. ████████, or any other doctor does not appear to have been involved in the discharge of Mr Willans. Nurse Practitioner Jones adds another diagnosis to the GP letter over and above that of her colleague despite never seeing the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively scrutinise the ambulatory care unit following a patient death

Wider context from the report

“(1) BCUHB have only just commenced an SIR on this matter and the ambulatory care unit, its structure, practices, systems, staff have not been effectively scrutinised following Mr Willans death in direct contravention of the policy of BCUHB on reporting and given this the following concerns do not appear to have been addressed potentially compromising patient safety until the conclusion of the SIR ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to learn from deaths through systematic review; Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to elicit family history of pulmonary embolism

Wider context from the report

“(5) The history recovered by Nurse Practitioner ████████ is inadequate in that it did not elicit family history of Pulmonary Embolism ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete clinical history-taking.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record consultant assessment and review of clinical results

Wider context from the report

“(2) ████████ the Consultant in charge of the unit did not make any entries in any of the notes for Mr Willans . There is no record of him examining the patient, the abnormal test results, the detail of the ultrasound scan. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delay in sending discharge information to the GP

Wider context from the report

“(4) There is insufficient safety netting for this patient. He was not told what to do in the event of a worsening of his condition. The letter to the GP was faxed the day after discharge by which time he had died ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.