PFD report

MORGAN-ROSE HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Dec 2023•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
11

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
33

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised11

  1. Delays and premature sign-off in Trust investigations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable completion and receipt of incident review reportsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety investigation reports and disclosure
  2. Failure of investigations to identify and document material issues and limitations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Failure to ensure complete therapeutic engagement records in patient observation sheets
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.23

  1. Action

    Provide Food and Fluid Refresher training to inpatient nursing staff.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Monitor Oxevision use through ward spot checks, DATIX review and maintained training records.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Develop and circulate a learning briefing on restricted items and other high-risk items.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Belts need not be added to the prohibited-items list because individualized risk assessments and care plans address self-harm risks.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays and premature sign-off in Trust investigations

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust investigation was materially incomplete and there was a lost an opportunity to: a. Understand concerns of the Family b. Acknowledge errors and learn lessons from the circumstances of the death. The Director of Operations and Matron informed the Trust Senior Management that the PSII Report had omissions. The Trust evidence was that it was an early adopter of the new NHS investigation process. The lead investigator did not report on material issues as to how Morgan-Rose was observed on the ward and the report was significantly delayed. Evidence was there was a pressure to sign the report off although it remained incomplete and did not contain a note about the limitations. c. d. Escalate concerns about staff observations - About 2 weeks after the death the Matron received a report that staff observations had not been appropriately conducted. This prompted a review of CCTV from the afternoon of Morgan-Rose’s death. There was insufficient scrutiny of the CCTV that showed that multiple observations entries made on 6 July 2022 after 14:06 hours could not be correct. e. Understand security issues on a locked mental health ward - It has not been possible to establish the identity of the person that reset the bathroom alert triggered for Morgan-Rose on 6 July 2022 at 15:31. The Trust does not have an accurate records of Trust staff pass allocation. The Trust investigation did not establish that staff borrowed each other's security passes. On the day of Morgan-Rose’s death a visitor pass issued had had access to the nursing office. The Trust was unable to provide the identity of this person. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable completion and receipt of incident review reports; Unreliable safety investigation reports and disclosure.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of investigations to identify and document material issues and limitations

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust investigation was materially incomplete and there was a lost an opportunity to: a. Understand concerns of the Family b. Acknowledge errors and learn lessons from the circumstances of the death. The Director of Operations and Matron informed the Trust Senior Management that the PSII Report had omissions. The Trust evidence was that it was an early adopter of the new NHS investigation process. The lead investigator did not report on material issues as to how Morgan-Rose was observed on the ward and the report was significantly delayed. Evidence was there was a pressure to sign the report off although it remained incomplete and did not contain a note about the limitations. c. d. Escalate concerns about staff observations - About 2 weeks after the death the Matron received a report that staff observations had not been appropriately conducted. This prompted a review of CCTV from the afternoon of Morgan-Rose’s death. There was insufficient scrutiny of the CCTV that showed that multiple observations entries made on 6 July 2022 after 14:06 hours could not be correct. e. Understand security issues on a locked mental health ward - It has not been possible to establish the identity of the person that reset the bathroom alert triggered for Morgan-Rose on 6 July 2022 at 15:31. The Trust does not have an accurate records of Trust staff pass allocation. The Trust investigation did not establish that staff borrowed each other's security passes. On the day of Morgan-Rose’s death a visitor pass issued had had access to the nursing office. The Trust was unable to provide the identity of this person. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure complete therapeutic engagement records in patient observation sheets

Wider context from the report

“(5) Trust oversight of care – the quality of record keeping was acknowledged not to be appropriate by nurses and senior staff during evidence, yet had been signed off: a. Observations sheets for vulnerable detained mental patients were signed off by nurses in charge as being appropriate despite an absence of any recorded therapeutic engagement b. Omissions in the recording of food and fluid charts required by the Responsible Clinician for a patient who was losing weight with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. c. The Responsible Clinician’s evidence was that the absence of appropriate food and fluid charts for other patients was an ongoing issue on Chelmer Ward that had been raised with nursing staff ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Omissions in required food and fluid chart recording

Wider context from the report

“(5) Trust oversight of care – the quality of record keeping was acknowledged not to be appropriate by nurses and senior staff during evidence, yet had been signed off: a. Observations sheets for vulnerable detained mental patients were signed off by nurses in charge as being appropriate despite an absence of any recorded therapeutic engagement b. Omissions in the recording of food and fluid charts required by the Responsible Clinician for a patient who was losing weight with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. c. The Responsible Clinician’s evidence was that the absence of appropriate food and fluid charts for other patients was an ongoing issue on Chelmer Ward that had been raised with nursing staff ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs; Unreliable recording of fluid balance information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain clear and consistent rules on patient belts

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was a dispute in evidence over whether it was or was not permitted for patients to have belts on Chelmer Ward, that has not been resolved. a. Morgan-Rose was on 1:1 observation due to her high risk of self-harm that including ligaturing and a belt was in her possession b. The Responsible Clinician and a Ward Manager providing support to staff gave evidence that at time that belts were not permitted c. The Trust senior management stated that belts were permitted and referenced the policy. The Updated ward documentation ‘Handover Checklist’ approved in October 2023 contains belts on a list of prohibited items. The Trust has stated that this is not correct although this was part of the After-Action Review and is in current use. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortfall of appropriate inpatient and community placements for autistic people with mental health and self-harm risks

Wider context from the report

“(7) There is a significant shortfall of appropriate placements for people with Autism who have mental health and self-harm risks in Essex both inpatient and the community. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate specialist placement arrangements for people requiring specialist care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate changes in leave risk

Wider context from the report

“(3) Escalation of risk – Morgan-Rose attempted to secure unescorted leave on the morning of her death, her Responsible Clinician had only authorised escorted leave. This was not escalated to the nurse in charge and the Responsible Clinician was not informed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breached; Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of accurate records of staff pass allocation and access

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust investigation was materially incomplete and there was a lost an opportunity to: a. Understand concerns of the Family b. Acknowledge errors and learn lessons from the circumstances of the death. The Director of Operations and Matron informed the Trust Senior Management that the PSII Report had omissions. The Trust evidence was that it was an early adopter of the new NHS investigation process. The lead investigator did not report on material issues as to how Morgan-Rose was observed on the ward and the report was significantly delayed. Evidence was there was a pressure to sign the report off although it remained incomplete and did not contain a note about the limitations. c. d. Escalate concerns about staff observations - About 2 weeks after the death the Matron received a report that staff observations had not been appropriately conducted. This prompted a review of CCTV from the afternoon of Morgan-Rose’s death. There was insufficient scrutiny of the CCTV that showed that multiple observations entries made on 6 July 2022 after 14:06 hours could not be correct. e. Understand security issues on a locked mental health ward - It has not been possible to establish the identity of the person that reset the bathroom alert triggered for Morgan-Rose on 6 July 2022 at 15:31. The Trust does not have an accurate records of Trust staff pass allocation. The Trust investigation did not establish that staff borrowed each other's security passes. On the day of Morgan-Rose’s death a visitor pass issued had had access to the nursing office. The Trust was unable to provide the identity of this person. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure in-person checks after bathroom alerts

Wider context from the report

“(4) Bathroom alerts – Evidence was heard that an Oxevision alert is triggered if a person is in the bathroom for more than 3 minutes and staff are required to complete an in-person check. Morgan-Rose was left in the bathroom unobserved for approximately 50 minutes. It was not clear from the evidence how the Trust proposes to ensure compliance in respect of this duty. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably supervise and monitor residents in care accommodation; Unreliable operation of the Oxevision patient-monitoring system.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient scrutiny of CCTV and staff observation records

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust investigation was materially incomplete and there was a lost an opportunity to: a. Understand concerns of the Family b. Acknowledge errors and learn lessons from the circumstances of the death. The Director of Operations and Matron informed the Trust Senior Management that the PSII Report had omissions. The Trust evidence was that it was an early adopter of the new NHS investigation process. The lead investigator did not report on material issues as to how Morgan-Rose was observed on the ward and the report was significantly delayed. Evidence was there was a pressure to sign the report off although it remained incomplete and did not contain a note about the limitations. c. d. Escalate concerns about staff observations - About 2 weeks after the death the Matron received a report that staff observations had not been appropriately conducted. This prompted a review of CCTV from the afternoon of Morgan-Rose’s death. There was insufficient scrutiny of the CCTV that showed that multiple observations entries made on 6 July 2022 after 14:06 hours could not be correct. e. Understand security issues on a locked mental health ward - It has not been possible to establish the identity of the person that reset the bathroom alert triggered for Morgan-Rose on 6 July 2022 at 15:31. The Trust does not have an accurate records of Trust staff pass allocation. The Trust investigation did not establish that staff borrowed each other's security passes. On the day of Morgan-Rose’s death a visitor pass issued had had access to the nursing office. The Trust was unable to provide the identity of this person. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use Oxevision only as an adjunct to face-to-face observations

Wider context from the report

“(6) Staff entries in patient observations sheets should have given rise to a concern that some staff may have been using Oxevision not just as an adjunct to face-to-face observations, but instead of them. This remains a concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of the Oxevision patient-monitoring system; Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Food and Fluid Refresher training to inpatient nursing staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All inpatient nursing staff are completing the Food and Fluid Refresher training delivered by the Professional Development Team.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor Oxevision use through ward spot checks, DATIX review and maintained training records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DATIX data reflects that staff are using Oxevission in adherence to policy and responding to alerts which has resulted in no harm. The Inpatient Leadership team continue to spot check ward practice and review DATIX data.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and circulate a learning briefing on restricted items and other high-risk items.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The EPUT Culture of Learning Lessons Team are developing and circulating a learning briefing to clarify correct process and share learning regarding restricted items and highlight other high risk items not included on the list. The learning brief is to be informed by existing policy.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the PSIRF policy to set learning-response timescales, sign-off requirements, safety-action-plan management and organisation-wide learning dissemination.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ The PSIRF Policy is being updated to reflect best practice. The policy includes time scale for completion of a learning response review and timely sign off. The policy also includes process for the management of safety action plan and cascading of learning across the trust.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out electronic observations across all wards with daily audit functionality and project-board oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have rolled out ‘e-observations’, across all wards, which is a mobile tablet (IPAD) electronic observation recording system; which records the patient observation with detail of patient presentation and engagement in the moment. There is an audit function within the system to enable ward managers to audit the quality of recording and engagement on a daily basis. There is an Oxehealth E-observations Project Board that has oversight of implementation, delivery and outcomes.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate and reinforce the Therapeutic Engagement and Supportive Observation policy across all wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The review of the Therapeutic Engagement and Supportive Observation policy has been completed and circulated to all staff.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Configure Oxevision bathroom alerts to repeat audibly and visually at three-minute intervals until the bathroom is exited.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Configuration changes to the Oxevission system have been implemented. This will ensure that bathroom alerts continue at 3 minute intervals until an individual has exited the bathroom. This includes the reset functionality of a repeatable and audible and tile illumination of an alert with timer continuation after each successive reset of the alert in 3-minute intervals.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce post-incident protocols for collating staff statements and triangulating written evidence with CCTV, Oxevision and body-worn-camera data.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Further, following a patient safety incident the following new ‘post incident immediate actions protocol’ will ensure that security measures in relation to the signing in and out of patient related records are immediately collated:”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refine patient-safety incident processes and reporting templates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improvement activities include:”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide ward security leads and numbered, traceable security passes for staff, including temporary staff, with shift sign-in and sign-out controls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ All wards have an allocated security lead/nurse 24/7 on each shift to support the Nurse in Charge and ensure that all ward staff have their own security passes (ACT), at the beginning of a shift.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and update Oxevision and observation procedures to align terminology and clarify alert-reset functionality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A clinical review of the SOPs for Oxevission and Oxevission Observations to align terminology and produce updated versions of the SOPs has been implemented. This includes ensuring the continuity of terminology in the SOP and all communications mirroring system based terms and wording.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an inpatient care framework with named-nurse responsibilities and personalised leave plans reviewed by clinical teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“EPUT are adopting and implementing an evidence based framework within inpatient services to support engagement, care planning and therapeutic intervention. This is an internationally recognised framework which will support a positive cultural change across all our ward environments around therapeutic engagement, holistic care planning (including leave plans), whilst considering the context of care. This will include re-establishing the ‘named nurse’ function and responsibilities.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train and retrain clinical staff in Oxevision, electronic observations and supportive-observation requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All clinical staff are being retrained or trained in the use of Oxevission and observations. In line with the Oxevission SOP and the Therapeutic engagement and supportive observation policy.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review multidisciplinary safety huddles and improve handovers through a nurse-in-charge checklist and task allocation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Communication will be improved within the multi - disciplinary team by reviewing the impact of the multi-disciplinary team safety huddles through a Qi methodology. As well as implementing improvements in the handover process with the introduction of the nurse in charge checklist and task allocation.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and disseminate restrictive-practice guidance, prohibited-item lists and handover forms using individualised risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s Global restrictive practice Guideline on the use of Global Restrictive Practices in In-Patient Units and the Restricted and Prohibited Items List – Inpatient Units CG92 – Appendix 1 has been updated and the restricted items reviewed through the Trust’s Restrictive Practice Trust Steering Group and Co-Production in December 2022.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a directly managed short-term service in South Essex for neuro-divergent young people.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In South Essex, we are developing a similar short term service as the one referred to in Colchester. These services will be directly run and managed by the Council.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with statutory partners, service providers and service users to identify housing needs and develop specialist care and support models.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the specific developments noted above, the Council works closely with our statutory partners; the Borough & Districts and NHS along with service providers and people who use services to identify future housing needs and to develop specialist models of care and support.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Repurpose Colchester accommodation into a four-bed short-term group home staffed by a multidisciplinary team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Alongside the solo provision, the Council is repurposing another accommodation in Colchester to be a group home. This will provide a 4 bedded short term (up to 6 months) placements, staffed by a multi-disciplinary team, to support neuro-divergent young people to live in the community.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a third solo children’s home through planning and a full rebuild.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council has approval for four solo bespoke registered Children Homes to work with Children and Young people with high needs that struggle to live with other people for a variety of reasons.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate an internally delivered solo bespoke children’s home in Colchester for young people with high needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council has approval for four solo bespoke registered Children Homes to work with Children and Young people with high needs that struggle to live with other people for a variety of reasons.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit capital bids for additional services for complex autistic young people with significant mental health issues, including single-person homes, move-on housing and preventative respite.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Transforming Care Partnership:”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a second Colchester solo children’s home through a tendered provider, subject to Ofsted registration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council has approval for four solo bespoke registered Children Homes to work with Children and Young people with high needs that struggle to live with other people for a variety of reasons.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve relationships with residential providers to increase access to local placements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Residential Accommodation Strategy:”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Belts need not be added to the prohibited-items list because individualized risk assessments and care plans address self-harm risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s Global restrictive practice Guideline on the use of Global Restrictive Practices in In-Patient Units and the Restricted and Prohibited Items List – Inpatient Units CG92 – Appendix 1 has been updated and the restricted items reviewed through the Trust’s Restrictive Practice Trust Steering Group and Co-Production in December 2022.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for commissioning hospital care rests with the NHS through Integrated Commissioning Boards and NHS England, not the Council.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Essex County Council has a joint responsibility with three Integrated Commissioning Boards across Essex for meeting the health and care needs of the residents in Essex. This includes ensuring that there is a sufficient supply and range of specialist community placements and other forms of support for people with autism and co-existing mental health needs.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. 1

    Adapt governance arrangements through collaborative learning involving care leadership, quality and safety specialists, and patient safety partners.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  2. 2

    Develop system-based Safety Improvement Plans from themes identified through historical incident learning.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  3. 3

    Commission PSIRF training, learning and development activities for staff, including senior leaders overseeing the process.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  4. 4

    Operate a PSIRF Improvement Oversight Project Board reporting to the Safety of Care Committee.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  5. 5

    Update records-management and adverse-incidents policies and distribute inpatient guidance on preserving records and post-incident actions.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  6. 6

    Develop and roll out a digital application providing access to standard operating procedures.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  7. 7

    Appoint a Matron lead and embed Registered General Nurses and physical-health champions across inpatient wards.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  8. 8

    Provide home-based care packages through local agencies or direct payments following social care assessment.

    Stated by Essex County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  9. 9

    Seek governance approval and capital funding to purchase a property for a fourth solo children’s home.

    Stated by Essex County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  10. 10

    Commission community-based short-break provision, including activities, mental-health training, autism publications, adapted holidays and subsidised local attractions.

    Stated by Essex County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adapt governance arrangements through collaborative learning involving care leadership, quality and safety specialists, and patient safety partners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Governance arrangements have been reviewed and currently being adapted which includes identification of early learning through collaborative approach with the care unit leadership, deputy directors of quality and safety subject matter expert and people with lived experience for example our patient safety partners, who are actively involved in the review process.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop system-based Safety Improvement Plans from themes identified through historical incident learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improvement activities include:”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission PSIRF training, learning and development activities for staff, including senior leaders overseeing the process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ We have commissioned a series of training, learning and development activities both internal and external to ensure staff are trained in the new PSIRF guidance approach including senior leaders who provide oversight for PSIRF process.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a PSIRF Improvement Oversight Project Board reporting to the Safety of Care Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has now convened a PSIRF Improvement Oversight Project Board which is chaired by the Executive Nurse and will report into the Safety of Care Committee which is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update records-management and adverse-incidents policies and distribute inpatient guidance on preserving records and post-incident actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ The requirement to preserve records is being re-enforced by the Trust. The Trust’s Records Management Policy is being updated, with the addition of a poster for inpatient services which outlines records/data which need to be retained and the process to follow within the initial 24 hour period. This will be distributed to mental health inpatient services. The updated policy contains further details of records retention the Trust will take after the initial 24 hours post-incident and within non-inpatient services. In addition, the Trust’s Adverse Incidents Policy is being updated to include the actions to be taken following an unexpected death wider”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and roll out a digital application providing access to standard operating procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A new digital app providing instant and easy access to Standard Operating Procedures has been developed. Implementation is in progress, with the rollout commencing in May 2024.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint a Matron lead and embed Registered General Nurses and physical-health champions across inpatient wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently implementing The International Fundamentals of Care Framework which outlines what is involved in the delivery of safe, effective, high-quality fundamental care, and what this care should look like in any healthcare setting and for any care recipient. This programme is being jointly led by the Nursing Directorate and Operations. A Matron lead post has been appointed to support implementation across all inpatient teams.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide home-based care packages through local agencies or direct payments following social care assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Where a need is identified through social care assessment, the Council offer home based care packages with local agencies. This is sourced directly or through direct payments based on the person and family’s needs and preferences.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek governance approval and capital funding to purchase a property for a fourth solo children’s home.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council has approval for four solo bespoke registered Children Homes to work with Children and Young people with high needs that struggle to live with other people for a variety of reasons.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission community-based short-break provision, including activities, mental-health training, autism publications, adapted holidays and subsidised local attractions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Wider Community Support and Services:”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026